Geopolitics isn't so one-dimensional. The US has long-standing agreements with Israel for intelligence, tech, and weapons in the middle east, like it or not. That can't just be unraveled at the drop of a hat without risking planetary stability.
Should the US not have put themselves in such a position in the 1950s? 100%. Should they have been more aggressive and quick on doing anything when the genocide started? Probably.
It wasn't "the democrats" or "the republicans." It was the US Federal Government as a whole. Choosing or abstaining a vote for a candidate solely on world events outside the US wouldn't have fixed that in any universe.
Reality can't be governed by aspiration, well, actually, I guess it can, because a bunch of idiots decided to hold back their vote that could have saved their own damn country, and look where the US is now, and now is only the beginning.
"Oh, I know, I don't like that my current Federal Government isn't being proactive world police in other countries even though I call out my nation for being proactive world police in other countries, so I'll show them by not voting for a Presidential candidate. They'll get my message...What do you mean a Genocidal Fascist Satan crew will win if I don't vote? They'll get my message! That's unpossible! I couldn't possibly be taking an action that will accelerate their genocide and lead to more genocide right in my home town?!"
Maybe too many people live in the world in their head instead of reality.
The modern them actually has an app that lets you build out recipes and/or scan barcodes to track what you eat, they use a distilled version of nutrition called "points" and you're allocated Y points a day to try stay in your food budget.
I think their older system was also points based just not software.
The app has training content and some kind of social community (that people say is quite terrible apparently because of the other users).
It isn't a bad concept, and helps one understand that a slice of pizza is insanely unhealthy if one didn't already know that.
Where it falls apart is their skeezy subscription model. Best time to sign up is around New Years, if you do bulk pricing you get a discount for the year, if you sign up partly through the year, that discount only lasts 10, 8, 7 months, however many are left. If you want to get a better rate, even their customer service says to just cancel and then sign back up after you're canceled. If they had honest flat-rate pricing and curated their social space/education material better, they'd likely have had something to offer...Instead, like most health tracking/exercise/apps that cost money, it's difficult to manage, expensive, and abrasive to cancel.
Like so many businesses that went "app" - they didn't embrace a usable and sustainable model that fit on a digital platform, and instead basically phoned it in.