solo
Why you say this the author seems legit. No?
Again then. Sometimes it's important not to talk about others and spend some time self reflecting. He's not there yet. For me, the power of denial is overrated.
His narrative is hilarious. Not me, everybody else
So according to statista in 2023 global emissions were 37.5 billions of tons, and exponentially growing since 1944.
In the article they say they can remove 36,000 tons of CO2 and the goal is
For the world to achieve "carbon neutrality" by 2050, "we should be removing something like six to 16 billion tons of CO2 per year from the air,"
That's a drop in the bucket alright. Sustainability and capitalism (with its embedded exponential growth) cannot coexist.
His brain is so toxic that the unfortunate worm died of poisoning.
I wouldn't hold my breath. For mtgox it took a decade like to start doing so. Centralized finance sucks by default.
Ok, I'll try to explain then.
There is no crypto without a blockchain, and blockchains live on the internet. Btw the projects that are worth in this environment are decentralized.
Federal courts in the US are passing laws and these laws are valid only in the US. They don't threaten the survival of the "crypto industry" cause they live on the internet, not in the US. It just makes it harder to create a legit project in the US, or if you are a user you will need a VPN to access some sites that are not available in the country you live in.
This is why there is binance.com (for almost everywhere, except US) and binance.us (only for the US). This article fails to mention this difference so claiming that:
The cryptocurrency industry is counting on the federal courts to survive
makes it clear to me that the author has no understanding of how crypto works. That's my good faith take on this article.
The cryptocurrency industry is counting on the federal courts to survive a sweeping enforcement crusade by Wall Street’s top regulator.
This statement can only mean that the author does not understand how blockchains work.