While the risks you describe are correct, it would seem that in some places the landlord expects an annual return of around 10%. That looks like an insanely high number to me and I don't think that the risk is this big.
sukhmel
joined 1 year ago
That would probably mean that the pay is much less unless the maintenance is required every other day
Well, obviously you assign nicer properties to those who did you favours in the past
Also, you can make all the houses equally undesired so that a true equality is achieved
This is just gold 🤣
Yeah, a lot of predators are running against the clock and can't afford to lose too many times.
I'd say only the species that live off humans are less affected by resource limitations, but you're right, I keep forgetting how hard it is for animals:
Not even just animals, really
What any corporation hears:
[some noise] for corporate profit
“There’s definitely some policy misfires,” [Employment Minister Randy Boissonnault] said. “The government was under a lot of pressure to do something and this is the best they came up with. But now we’ve got the unintended consequences of having a whole bunch of people in Canada not wanting to go home.”
No shit, Sherlock. Good that it's just not needed anymore migrants that are going to suffer from govt failures. And if they are needed again, govt can just make another policy that misfires the same way
Man, this makes me sad and angry at the same time :(
Well, every country has its own set of incomprehensible pronunciations ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Maybe they don't subscribe
DouYin, you know, the Chinese YouTube
That's sarcasm though, as I expect them to be as malicious as YouTube
Besides, it helps a lot when voiceover is in a language you are learning or can't comprehend by hearing well enough (like Trainspotting)
This is but their legit response was "dunno, that wasn't supposed to happen but it kinda did, maybe don't do anything now, we'll try to fix it sometimes", so this is not that far: