sukhmel

joined 2 years ago
[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 7 points 1 year ago

So, you're suggesting we make games per hour subscription? A good idea /s

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

Although you may be right about why they did it, I feel like imagery of gambling is not meant to be 'something that is in any way related to something that happens to be gambling', it's when gambling is shown but you're not the one gambling. If someone in game is gambling that's imagery, if a game uses cards for something that is not gambling it's not imagery.

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

Maybe winning a game award while being solo developer studio, it feels like this to me

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago

So… solitaire should be 18+ after all?

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 9 points 1 year ago

Also, if this is only a change in managing bugs, nothing may have changed except for more bug tracking for trivial bugs, or the opposite, ignoring more severe bugs

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

I think, this was what future was imagined at the beginning of the previous century. It definitely is what I would rather like to see instead of what we got, where automation is not for easing the work, but for removing the people.

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

With this best outcome I agree, it would be nice if there were less violence, not more.

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It doesn't work on all the cats, though. ~~Also, I heard that it's not painful for a cat to be lifted that way, but~~ I would prefer not to.

Edit: I was wrong

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

Why would they want to off this kid.

So that he can't be tried and found non-guilty. So that he wouldn't spread dangerous ideas. So that he pays for his transgressions.

I don't know what could be their reasoning, but I would expect them wanting to off him behind the scenes rather than await for the trial results.

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Ok, so now instead of 'eat the rich' we're going 'eat everyone except for the absolute poor', right?

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

I would guess that it allows to detect tampering if you have to give your phone to the security officers and they do or don't do something with it without you present. I heard of such occurrences on the border, but this happens in other places and countries, too. Not sure if locked bootloader would help, though

view more: ‹ prev next ›