sukhmel

But if it doesn't matter, what's the problem with tons?

Reminds me of this a bit

So "doin research" = "throwing away anything contradicting to your views". Makes sense ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Also if my understanding of US patents is correct (chances are low, but still) you can use sha1 instead of md5 and change some other minor thing and it'll not infringe that patent ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

I'd say that sometimes it may even be beneficial to shareholders because they will not have to deal with people in the company that are there only to up the workspace numbers. You know, those job positions that only exist because of how wrecked the system is now

I so much hope it's going to be rhe second. I doubt it will 😢

"What's your mother tongue, is it JavaScript?"

Wow, yeah, I only heard part of it, think I should go read a bit

I agree with you, but also I have seen many times how trigger-happy internet crowd may be. Maybe he thinks that nobody will read an explanation past the first word. Or maybe he's guilty of abuses, we'll hopefully see

Somehow, as of lately, when people start to talk about rationality it is mostly about some bizarre stuff like bombing datacenters or living in a country that leads an aggressive war because you earn more.

Maybe it's just a survivor bias and everyone is about bizarre stuff in these times, though

I agree with him, though. It was much better on Nibiru watching human gladiators fighting Mi-Go in the death pit.

It seems like this would solve the wrong problem with digital ownership. Even now the problem is not how to prove it, the problem is that you have to prove, and also that it's not ownership