temp1211241

joined 1 year ago
[–] temp1211241@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

For financial reasons they'll find the same "the cheaper for the owners result is fine" they have in the past, regardless of what other external researchers show.

[–] temp1211241@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

He still is but so is the “front runner” who really shouldn’t be higher than 5th in the MVP conversation behind 3 other QBs and 2 position players.

[–] temp1211241@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

We’re getting really loose with that term where the QB leading in most stats is barely even in the conversation.

Maybe it’s the other sports fan in me but I think MVPs should be the top player or top two in at least a few positive categories. Not just referring to QBs here.

[–] temp1211241@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

How, after that performance, does either of them rank as an MVP front runner?

[–] temp1211241@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Must be nice.