wizzim

joined 2 years ago
[–] wizzim@infosec.pub 3 points 1 month ago

Try to get the deluxe version with the Mooncrash DLC, as the DLC alone is often expensive.

[–] wizzim@infosec.pub 12 points 1 month ago

Linux does support TPM and secure boot: https://wiki/ .debian.org/SecureBoot#What_is_UEFI_Secure_Boot.3F

So the problem is really only about kernel level anticheat, not the secure boot itself ?

[–] wizzim@infosec.pub 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I am not a C developer, but I found the "helper has a terrible name" and "it's not clear what the helper is doing" arguments a bit weak.

Who in they right mind does not think the helper creates a 32 bytes word by putting the 16 bytes of the first argument followed by the 16 bytes of the second one ?

[–] wizzim@infosec.pub 14 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I am not sure about this conspiracy theory of yours: Microsoft does not want third party applications in the kernel space anymore.

https://www.theverge.com/news/692637/microsoft-windows-kernel-antivirus-changes

[–] wizzim@infosec.pub 2 points 2 months ago

I don't understand this point.

Linux does support TPM and secure boot: https://wiki.debian.org/SecureBoot#What_is_UEFI_Secure_Boot.3F

I thought the problem for Linux players was "just" the kernel anticheat ?

[–] wizzim@infosec.pub 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Ah yes correct.

Thanks for the lengty review, this game is also on my radar.

There has been a big review in the french game magazine CanardPC: they praised its originality but warned for its difficulty and "unfairness".

[–] wizzim@infosec.pub 2 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I think this is made by the same studio as The Invincible.

[–] wizzim@infosec.pub 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

If you come from Debian, you can also consider Linux Mint Debian Edition - LMDE, which should be even easier for you.

Currently it's LMDE 6 but a new release is around the corner, with the imminent release of Debian Trixie.

[–] wizzim@infosec.pub 3 points 4 months ago

Thanks for the thorough explanation!

Then it's a mystery why the didn't use Hall effect joysticks. It the cost of the part so much more expensive?

[–] wizzim@infosec.pub 18 points 4 months ago (6 children)

While Nintendo is absolutely to blame for not fixing the situation, I've heard they were not going for hall effect sticks because of the interference with the joycons magnets.

Full disclosure, I have no Switch, Retrodeck Enthusiast here 😁

[–] wizzim@infosec.pub 42 points 4 months ago (1 children)

There was this post on Reddit listing some PRs opened by AI at .NET: https://www.reddit.com/r/ExperiencedDevs/comments/1krttqo/my_new_hobby_watching_ai_slowly_drive_microsoft/?share_id=ks1HasJ2tqDuCOW6TCYTz

It's pretty funny and depressing at the same time...

view more: next ›