this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2026
72 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck Cars

16106 readers
752 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

... a Ford patent application titled "Systems and Methods to Repossess a Vehicle" was published by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Feb. 23, although it was submitted to the agency Aug. 20, 2021.

The document describes using vehicles' built-in data connections to remotely disable "a functionality of one or more components of the vehicle," which would serve as warnings if the owner has missed car payments.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 9 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

I'm not driving anything made after 2010 for the rest of my life, if I can manage it.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Neither am I, but remember that that's only a workaround, not a solution. The only actual solution to this shit is political.

[–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

That's not really the only solution. It's just the least violent solution.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

Even if something is violent, that doesn't make it stop being political.

[–] queerlilhayseed@piefed.blahaj.zone 9 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

We need to break the integration between hardware and software. If a machine can run software, then the software must be owner-auditable and owner-replaceable. If it's not, then whoever owns the software will own the hardware forever.

We also need safe, reliable, standard software for machines, and we need laws that enforce that machines be compatible with standard software before they can be sold.

It's a tall order, but I think the only other option is to continue down the path of hardware with corporate-dictated expiration dates and built-in surveillance.

[–] content_educator_94@thelemmy.club 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Yeah that makes sense

Make this shit the way it works please

[–] queerlilhayseed@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 points 44 minutes ago

Working on it. Part of the process is talking about it, refining ideas and building a coalition. It's going to take the combined efforts of software nerds, hardware nerds, econ nerds, and policy / regulatory nerds to get something like this to succeed, and it's going to take a sustained effort over years.

It also requires the destruction or at least a severe diminishment of the current global technofascist oligopolarchy so it doesn't get co-opted as a tool for the ruling class, so... yeah, it'll take a while. But I think it's worth doing.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

That's not going to happen unless someone important dies because of it.

[–] mjr@infosec.pub 1 points 7 hours ago

WIth the terrible safety record of cars, that may be more likely than you think.