this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2026
226 points (99.1% liked)

Fuck Cars

16203 readers
520 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://hilariouschaos.com/post/12281799

A rising star boxer was killed after she was struck by an alleged road rage driver who deliberately reversed into her as she rode her bike along a Texas highway, police said.

Hannah Rapp, 26, who challenged for the WBC women’s featherweight championship last month, died Saturday morning after being struck by a car, according to a

...

Rapp’s boyfriend said Medina accelerated backward before striking Rapp, causing her to hit her head on the rear window.

Medina, of Navasota, has a lengthy rap sheet and has been booked into the Brazos County Jail 13 times since 2012, according to online jail records obtained by KBTX.

Those include criminal mischief, theft, resisting arrest, assault, hit and run, escape from custody, deadly conduct, possession of a controlled substance, and multiple driving offenses.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Naich@piefed.world 80 points 1 day ago (3 children)

"The driver of the car, Charles Medina, 31, was later arrested and charged with manslaughter..."

MANSLAUGHTER???????

[–] Pxtl@lemmy.ca 39 points 1 day ago (1 children)

IANAL but AFAIK they only need one charge to hold him and they can tack on more charges later. Realistically plea bargaining means that he won't actually get convicted of murder, but they could still use a murder charge to get him to cop to manslaughter.

[–] winkerjadams@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Dudes been in jail 13 times already. Maybe we can just decide he's not good for society at this point and put him somewhere he can't hurt innocent people anymore. Or maybe I'm the crazy one for thinking this

[–] TomMasz@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm surprised they didn't just ticket him for failure to yield right of way or something equally minor.

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's what the person who hit me (a pedestrian) got. Less than a $70 ticket. I got a permanently injured knee, a crooked nose, $12k in medical debt, and 7+ years of ruined credit.

Still bitter about it twenty years later.

Track him down and run him over with a car.

[–] Ooops@feddit.org 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

In most legislations the qualifyer for more than that is premeditated action. And being a moron with low impulse control and a tendency for road rage sadly is the opposite.

The actual question is how someone like that is still allowed behind a wheel.

[–] VibeSurgeon@piefed.social 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

As I understand, it's Mens Rea that determines whether it's manslaughter or murder.

It's hard to argue this person didn't do it on purpose. Hence, murder, not manslaughter.

[–] ivanvector@piefed.ca 4 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

My understanding (not a lawyer) is the difference is intent to kill. Murder requires that the accused clearly intended to kill the victim, while manslaughter only requires that the accused intended to do the thing which resulted in the victim's death.

"Hard to argue", sure, but that's not the standard of a legal trial. The prosecution would need to prove beyond doubt that the driver meant for Rapp to die, not just that he meant to hit her with his car.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago

It looks like this could go either way as a reasonable person would assume that intentionally hitting someone with your car poses a real possibility of killing them. Looks like the examples of negligent vehicular manslaughter are usually things like reckless driving or driving under the influence.

Personally (not a lawyer) I'd consider it murder if I was on a jury given the information I have. Hitting someone with a car on purpose is akin to hitting them with a club. Sure, you may not have thought it was likely to kill them, but you weren't trying not to kill them.

That premeditation can be as short as a few seconds. People get convicted of murder when they get in a bar fight, leave the bar to grab a gun, then come back into the bar to continue the fight, resulting in an eventual shooting. If you kill someone in a random act of passion in a bar, it's manslaughter. But just the short time to go and grab a weapon is enough time to meet the standard of premeditation. All that matters is you have a brief moment to think about it.