"The driver of the car, Charles Medina, 31, was later arrested and charged with manslaughter..."
MANSLAUGHTER???????
A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!
1. Be Civil
You may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.
2. No hate speech
Don't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.
3. Don't harass people
Don't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.
4. Stay on topic
This community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.
5. No reposts
Do not repost content that has already been posted in this community.
Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.
In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:
"The driver of the car, Charles Medina, 31, was later arrested and charged with manslaughter..."
MANSLAUGHTER???????
I'm surprised they didn't just ticket him for failure to yield right of way or something equally minor.
That's what the person who hit me (a pedestrian) got. Less than a $70 ticket. I got a permanently injured knee, a crooked nose, $12k in medical debt, and 7+ years of ruined credit.
Still bitter about it twenty years later.
Track him down and run him over with a car.
IANAL but AFAIK they only need one charge to hold him and they can tack on more charges later. Realistically plea bargaining means that he won't actually get convicted of murder, but they could still use a murder charge to get him to cop to manslaughter.
In most legislations the qualifyer for more than that is premeditated action. And being a moron with low impulse control and a tendency for road rage sadly is the opposite.
The actual question is how someone like that is still allowed behind a wheel.
That premeditation can be as short as a few seconds. People get convicted of murder when they get in a bar fight, leave the bar to grab a gun, then come back into the bar to continue the fight, resulting in an eventual shooting. If you kill someone in a random act of passion in a bar, it's manslaughter. But just the short time to go and grab a weapon is enough time to meet the standard of premeditation. All that matters is you have a brief moment to think about it.
As I understand, it's Mens Rea that determines whether it's manslaughter or murder.
It's hard to argue this person didn't do it on purpose. Hence, murder, not manslaughter.
Happy to see that the article isn't mincing words calling this a "crash" or an "accident" and Texas has him booked for manslaughter. Hopefully when it comes time to take him to court they can up that to murder (and, realistically, plea bargain him back down to manslaughter).
I do wonder if the subjects were reversed - if it were a Latino run over by a white woman - if Texas would take this as seriously.
hit and run
[...]
and multiple driving offenses
People like that should not be driving. I realize that in Texas it's cruel to take somebody's license because that's basically crippling them. That's one of the many costs of car-centric planning: Since everyone must drive, it becomes unthinkable to take that away from someone.
Could always ride a bike if you can't drive. Privilege and all that jazz.
I've seen a few other articles about this in other communities that I chose not to crosspost because of overly-soft language.
also @ https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jul/19/boxer-hannah-rapp-dies-struck-by-car
Medina had sped past Rapp and her boyfriend when the boyfriend raised his hands. The court records alleged that Medina slammed on his brakes, backed into Rapp and hit her so hard that she shattered the rear windshield.
Medina, when speaking later with investigators, denied hitting Rapp on purpose, said the records cited by KHOU. He allegedly told them that he believed Rapp and her boyfriend were flagging him down, so he stopped, backed up and did not see Rapp until right before hitting her, KHOU reported.
Back over him a few times before trial so he has a proper understanding of his actions.
I know it's not the right way to convict someone legally, but dude has both driving offenses and hit and run on his record.
no one is questioning his ...CONVICTion.