this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2026
500 points (94.2% liked)

News

38932 readers
1193 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Wolfe and his fiancée, who witnessed the alleged assault, believe the attack was related to Wolfe being transgender, according to court documents.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Cool. As an adult, I have lots of devices around that could horribly injure or kill me if used improperly. Are you saying I shouldn't own a table saw, ladder, or vehicle?

What if I've been prescribed medication which could kill me if I took the whole bottle? Should I not keep my medication around?

Thank goodness you're here. I guess I wasn't up to the task of managing risk and making my own decisions.

[–] Terrorphin@thelemmy.club 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You should weigh the costs and benefits of each. If you need help, in the United States table saws cause roughly zero deaths in the US every year, by contrast guns kill roughly 45,000 people annually.

[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Considering there are something like 450,000,000 firearms in this country, and since many of those deaths are deliberately self-inflicted, those odds don't seem too bad. It ain't like a firearm will just go off on its own. Certainly reason to preach caution, but not fear. Guns demand training, mindfulness, and care. They're not for people who want to be coddled. You say it's dangerous. Of course it is! That's the point.

Nazis must not be the only group armed. Gun rights are minority rights. Every gun ban in this country has been used to oppress minorities, never to disarm fascists. You're talking to us as if you're the adult and we are children unaware of the risks. We are not. We are taking our lives and freedoms into our own hands, and preparing to defend them. You wanna use peaceful protest, go ahead. Nothing wrong with that. But you don't get to tell minorities not to make use of the tools legally available for self defense. We indulged you before, when fascism still feared to take over. But they've never been defeated peacefully. Now it's time for liberals to stop whining about us preparing against it. Not like y'all ever did a damn thing to prevent their rise in the first place.

[–] Terrorphin@thelemmy.club 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Honestly you seem like a child unable to assess the risks. Sure - the odds of any individual in the US being killed with their own gun is small, but it is dramatically higher than the odds of them defending themselves against an assailant. It's just an unnecessary game of russian roulette. Owning a gun is a hazard that makes people significantly less safe than not owning one.

[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

Nice try ignoring every point I made. Yes, the risk of being killed with your own weapon IS small. Vanishingly small. And yet you certainly are worried about it happening to a stranger online who is at a much higher risk of being murdered than you are, you average milquetoast liberal. I don't think you care about the person on the other end at all. Obviously you're content to ignore the fact that transfolk are assaulted and murdered at wildly higher rates than the average white person. I think you just hate the idea of people using guns to defend themselves.

[–] Terrorphin@thelemmy.club 0 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

It's not clear to me what point you are making. If you like to fondle guns, then feel free to. But the reality is that owning a gun makes someone dramatically less safe. That's just a fact.

[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Yeah, I can easily detect your deliberate refusal to consider the circumstances of others.

[–] Terrorphin@thelemmy.club 0 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I have considered the circumstances - in every circumstance their risk of dying goes up.

[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 1 points 58 minutes ago* (last edited 54 minutes ago) (1 children)
[–] Terrorphin@thelemmy.club 1 points 56 minutes ago (1 children)
[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 1 points 54 minutes ago* (last edited 53 minutes ago) (1 children)

You absolutely have not considered different circumstances. If that was true, you'd cite those numbers instead. But no, you conflated the ones convenient to your prejudice and ignored all the ones that threatened it. Your life is safe enough, for now. Nothing of the sort exists for transfolk, and you don't care.

[–] Terrorphin@thelemmy.club 0 points 51 minutes ago (1 children)

What circumstances are you talking about? You are being very vague. There is no sub-group who are safer owning guns than not. That is very very clear.

[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 1 points 49 minutes ago (1 children)

I cannot imagine being that deliberately obtuse.

[–] Terrorphin@thelemmy.club 0 points 48 minutes ago (1 children)

And yet you are very very obtuse - what are you actually trying to say??

[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 1 points 48 minutes ago (1 children)

Who have I been talking about?

[–] Terrorphin@thelemmy.club 0 points 45 minutes ago (1 children)

I have literally no idea - you are vague and all over the place. Perhaps if you just said what you mean instead of making obtuse and vague ramblings it would be easier to follow. Who have you been talking about?

[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 1 points 42 minutes ago (1 children)

What group have I repeatedly mentioned who experience much higher rates of assault and murder than the average white person? Either answer the question or fuck off.

[–] Terrorphin@thelemmy.club 0 points 40 minutes ago (1 children)

Again with the vague and obtuse. Instead of answering the question you ramble more. I am not in the market for trying to guess what you are talking about. Either say it or don't, but if you won't then there is literally no point talking to you is there?

[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 1 points 39 minutes ago* (last edited 38 minutes ago) (1 children)

Transfolk. Say it or fuck off.

[–] Terrorphin@thelemmy.club 1 points 38 minutes ago (1 children)

Well done. It wasn't that hard, was it?

[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 0 points 36 minutes ago (1 children)

For you it was. Now fuck off.

[–] Terrorphin@thelemmy.club 0 points 35 minutes ago (1 children)

Why? The problem here is that while trans folk are at elevated risk of violence, they are also massively more at risk of harm both at their own hands and by intimate partners. Advising trans folk to own a gun harms them. Their risk of being killed goes up the same as anyone else.

[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 1 points 32 minutes ago (1 children)

Nope, you pretended not to understand in order to avoid saying the word. You don't give a shit about them. Conversation is over.

[–] Terrorphin@thelemmy.club 0 points 29 minutes ago (1 children)

No, I have no problem talking about trans folk. I have great concern for the welfare of trans people - that is why I think it is irresponsible to suggest they should buy guns - that would harm them - something I don't want.

[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 0 points 26 minutes ago (1 children)

Bullshit. Conversation is already over.

[–] Terrorphin@thelemmy.club 0 points 24 minutes ago (1 children)

Because you are committed to pretending not to understand the facts.

[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 0 points 20 minutes ago (1 children)

This conversation is over. As I have told you many times now.

[–] Terrorphin@thelemmy.club 1 points 19 minutes ago (1 children)

Because you can no longer effectively pretend not to understand the facts.

[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 1 points 15 minutes ago (1 children)

This conversation is over. As I have told you many times now.

[–] Terrorphin@thelemmy.club 1 points 12 minutes ago (1 children)

It's difficult to keep pretending you don't understand the issue, isn't it? ;)

[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 1 points 10 minutes ago (1 children)

This conversation is over. As I have told you many times now.

[–] Terrorphin@thelemmy.club 1 points 9 minutes ago (1 children)

Because you want to continue to harm trans people.... ;)

[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 1 points 4 minutes ago

You still talking?