this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2026
231 points (97.1% liked)

Ask Lemmy

41122 readers
2183 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, toxicity and dog-whistling are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !uspolitics@lemmy.world


7) No Hit-and-Run questions.
Please don't delete your post for no apparent reason. If you plan on deleting a question later, say so in the post, or if you feel that you have a good reason to remove it, message a mod beforehand. It's not fair to the ones who took their time to answer, and it's not in the spirit of the community.


8) No Bots.
Posts or comments from bots, LLM's, AIs, Neural Networks, Transformers, or Marvin the Paranoid Android are not welcome in AskLemmy. Real humans only please.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I still can't stop but think how stretched out the Hobbit films were, for an otherwise short book. That's a sin that stains forever with me. The Lord of the Rings films, do have their own flaws, but they're fairly contained and can be debated as to whether they were good or not. I have so much trouble excusing anything with the Hobbit though.

And I hope we never, ever see anyone tackle The Silmarillion. Simply because, there will be so much improvised fluff in that would-be film, that it'd make the Hobbit films blush.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dil@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I like foundation, it gaves star trek vibes some episodes, more star wars lately

[–] janewaydidnothingwrong@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The foundation series is tough. It is simultaneously one of the absolutely least faithful and most disrespectful adaptations of science fiction literature of all time, and a really good show. I wish I could watch it without the lens of the books buuuut I can't.

[–] foggenbooty@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

I haven't read the books, but have heard recommendations for the show. I tried to watch it, but had to turn it off after the first three episodes. The visuals were great, but I found the writing and dialogue to be really bad. So many heavy handed references to that girl being smart. Counting prime numbers for fun while swimming or something up to an impossible number, etc. There were other things but that's what I remember for some reason.

Usually when I notice something like that it persists, so I stopped watching. Did the dialogue bother you and did it get better, or is this just a subjective a taste thing?

[–] dil@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 hours ago

The series changes heavily once the foundation is set in motion, which is about episode 4ish? If Hari Seldon is still alive, you haven't gotten to the good part of the show yet (sorry for the spoiler but hes about to die soon based off what you're saying) The girl is not just smart, shes a mutant (they are like in the year 12,000, she isnt the first mutant) psychic who can see her own future. She is good at math so she is at haris level when it comes to psycohistory, which is telling the future using advanced math/ai or whatever the fk from the future.

Harry has a plan which involves dying to become a martyr which eventually should lead to the coming dark age he predicted only lasting 100 years instead of forever. Almost immediately sht fucks up and they deviate from the predicted timeline with it branching in another direction.

The writing gets good or at least very enterting and fast paced after hari seldon dies which is season 1 episode 2s ending I think.

[–] dil@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 hours ago

It gets better over time, season 2 episode 4ish is where I got more into it. It's like a 7/10 season 1, 8/10 by the end of season 2, end of season 3 was a solid 8.5/10 for me, i like the direction it went. Season 1 is more regular scifi, 2 is more magical, and 3 is just star wars jedi sht. The series is like for all mankind with timeskips ocasionally. If you like empire, you get a different batch of the day, dawn, and dusk every season, which is probably my favorite part. (same actors playing different roles)

I mostly like that by season 3 you are 300+ years in the future from season 1 with some characters still around because of cryosleep, cloning, robots, etc.. I like seeing the world progress/fall over time.

[–] janewaydidnothingwrong@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

It seemed like fairly standard tv stuff to me. Personally, if I'm watching a show that is grounded in the mundane eg the first season of true detective or breaking bad, i expect the dialogue to be very good and for the plot to be subtle and engaging in a complex way, but if I'm watching a SF show like a grandiose space opera then I have very different expectations. I am okay with some goofy dialogue, a lot of monologuing, more simple plot structure (since the setting is often complex in SF shows so it's often more of showing a familiar dynamic in a wildly unfamiliar context like star trek is all about), etc. All this ranting to say that since it's a galactic scale space opera i want crazy visuals, cool SF concepts, and an imagining of human mores and taboos set in a far flung future, I am willing to tolerate a lot more floppy plot and character interaction. My problem with this show in particular is just that it is a teeeeeeerrrible "adaptation" of someone else's work, but if they had just taken inspiration from Asimov and not used all the nouns and settings like they're trying to cajole the plot into show form, I would have been pretty happy with it. There's not a lot of original SF on TV and they clearly had enough ideas where they could have just walked their own path.

[–] dil@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

Do you like watching galactic empires progress/fall over time with timeskips and solid cgi? The show picks up as it goes because the characters don't know anything yet. The theme changes as empire falls and the clones get further from the original. The 2nd foundation is a pretty nice aditition too. Demerezel being the last ancient robot forced to serve emprie but also kill them and replace them if they don't act like empire is pretty fun. A lot of stiff isn't revealed early on tho.

And the cgi is so solid, could never be less than a 6/10 for me because of that.

It has all the good things for a space opera show, it's really refreshing outside of the Asimov context. I will quibble about the adaptation aspect but I definitely recommend the show to anyone looking for a good watch

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

Do you think people would have enjoyed the TV show as much though with all the cast changes that would have been required?

I haven't read the books, but my understanding is that was why, so they could have recurring characters and some continuity.

Edit: and once you do that... well all sorts of shit changes.

[–] janewaydidnothingwrong@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (2 children)

I think they just shouldn't have made it in fhe first place as it clearly wouldn't work as a show. Instead they just made everything up and used all the nouns. There are clearly some stories that can be adapted and some that cant and I hate the trend of just adapting things with big names attached to them to make money. Dune made for cool movies, Rendevous With Rama is begging to be adapted to the screen and I can't wait for it. Asimov is dialogue driven and concept heavy and just shouldn't be adapted.

(edit: stop adapting everything and just make up new stuff i.e. give me raised by wolves back you fucks!)

[–] dil@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I like raised by wolves, but I prefer demerezel from foundation to the android there. More empathy for her.

She is for sure a great character! Lee pace is amazing, and I always love seeinf Jared Harris in anything (Fringe is my favorite show). Like I said, it's a GREAT show, just a bad adaptation.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

Thats definitely a fair take.