this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2026
449 points (99.3% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

17744 readers
579 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--If a picture is just a screenshot of an article, link the article

--If a video's content isn't clear from title, write a short summary so people know what it's about.

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world 171 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Well Ed fucking sucks. This is more than just passively looking away. Silencing criticism of a genocide makes you actively complicit.

History will remember people like this.

[–] hOrni@lemmy.world 100 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And Macklemore is cool. He might be cringy, but he's genuine and I like him. Saw him live once and it was one of the best shows I ever saw.

[–] bedwyr@piefed.ca 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I didn't like him because his line on his hit song about wearing fur, which I am against. But now, I am 100% behind this muthafucka.

[–] Wolf314159@startrek.website 7 points 21 hours ago

That was notably a line about wearing used fur, not sourcing new fur for new clothes. I think that is an important distinction when evaluating the moral arguments against wearing fur. Still totally valid to be against any fur clothing, but that line feels a lot less immoral to me in context.

[–] psycotica0@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If it's the line and song I'm thinking it is, it's about finding an assortment of things, including a second hand fur already at a thrift store, and giving it a second life by assembling an eclectic wardrobe out of what's present. I get that it still produces an image, but it's not driving demand in the same way.

[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 5 points 21 hours ago

Yeah it's about reusing something already made.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago (4 children)

It's not Ed, it's the industry...

Like Macklemore said himself:

What happened to the artist? What d'you got to say?

If I was on a label, you could drop me today

I'd be fine with it 'cause the heart fed my page

I want a ceasefire, fuck a response from Drake (Woo)

Macklemore is truly independent, he can say whatever the fuck he wants.

Ed has "his own label" but it's owned by Warner, so if they tell him to do something, he has to do it.

There's only a handful of major labels, but they "give" popular artists sub-labels to cultivate an illusion of diversity.

Epitaph is one of "biggest small labels" and they even pull the same shit, although I'm not gonna complain Tim Armstrong gets more autonomy....

[–] docd@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Macklemore continued: “His typical apolitical stance was being challenged in a way it never had been before. He told me that the words ‘Free Palestine’ and the image of the Palestinian flag were hurtful to a lot of people he spoke with. I told him that if those words were more offensive than tens of thousands of Palestinian children being killed by Israel, then there was a fundamental disconnect between where those people stood and where I stood. But he couldn’t get past his public facing, ‘I don’t take sides.’”

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 6 points 21 hours ago

so a de facto fascist rather than an intentional one

[–] khannie@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

‘I don’t take sides.’”

What an absolute bitch. Take a fucking side.

[–] jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works 2 points 21 hours ago

The point of ed sheeran is to be as bland as the average isekai/harem protagonist

[–] inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That's a distinction without a difference. Of course the label were a factor here, likely the deciding one. But that just makes the label culpable without absolving Ed from it. They all fucking suck, but Ed is still the one doing shows. He could/should have made Macklemore a condition of contuining to perform.

I get what you are saying, this choice wasn't made by Ed alone. But at the end of the day, all I see is a genocide being covered up. It doesn't matter if we blame the artist or the label more, all of them are complicit in silencing criticism. They should all be addressed, called out and remembered for their active inaction.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How did that work out for Sinéad O'Connor?

And if you don't know who that is, there's a fucking reason.

Was it Courtney Love that got blacklisted for a decade because her advice to young girls was "if Harvey Weinstein invites you to a party, don't go."

Of course I do, and frankly they have both worked out quite well morally speaking. Courtneys clip got a lot of play during MeToo. She was one of the few to talk about an open secret.

So to be clear, you think Courtney shouldn't have talked? She should have known and kept it to herself like all the other slimey enablers? Because that's what Ed "I don't pick sides" Sheeran politics does, enables. No amount of money or fame should be worth ignoring genocide.

[–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I guess Ed Sheeran was... Warned.

[–] wangaBanga@feddit.online 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And Christ, what's the point or fame and power if you're not allowed to call a fucking genocide a genocide?

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Both sides coward