this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2026
251 points (79.4% liked)

Showerthoughts

44473 readers
1228 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

All their responses are generated, no conscience there, just AI. "Another brick in the wall" hits stronger than ever now.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] glitchdx@lemmy.world 35 points 5 days ago (6 children)

This is exactly the kind of black and white reasoning that annoys me about online discourse. The camps of "neverslop" and "techbro shill" are extremely vocal, and squeeze out anyone in between with a nuanced opinion (like myself). And I know I'm not the only one because I get upvotes!

Fuck, Linus Torvalds uses ai. Is he an unthinking npc now? If anyone might be an authority on the ethical use of ai, it would be him.

"But Glitch, that's an appeal to authority fallacy!"

Okay, hypothetical strawman, you have a point.

Sure, there's people who exist who operate like how op describes. I'm not disputing that. But saying everyone who uses ai at all is braindead is both incorrect and insulting. I use ai for some shit, it's genuinely a somewhat useful tool and middling quality entertainment. But did ai write this comment? No, it did not, nor has ai told me what my opinions should be. So, proposal disproved by counterexample.

Someone is going to tell me I'm taking this too seriously, i can feel it.

[–] FunnyUsername@lemmy.world 20 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

this one time I had a huge 200 file folder full of ugly filenames i needed to be standardized to use in a script. Renaming them all manually was easily a 3 hour job at least. I described the end result name syntax i wanted and gave the full list of the current file names to an llm, and it gave me a powershell script that renamed every file for me perfectly in 2 minutes.

could i have coded that myself? sure. but then I'd be deciding between "three hours making a complicated file renaming script or 3 hours or manually renaming 200 files for 3 hours". The llm solved my problem for me and allowed me to continue with my actual work rather than wasting time doing data entry.

is this stupid npc behavior? if it is then it sure seems like only npc idiots like saving time.

[–] Peerpeer@lemmy.world 15 points 5 days ago

Yup, that is where I also use AI for. The boring stuff. Clicking on repeat for 3 hours and then it turns out you made a mistake and need to do it all over again. No thanks.

The creative things I do myself.

[–] glitchdx@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago

I think that's perfectly reasonable, just review the script first for anything that might break your pc.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

somewhat useful tool and middling quality entertainment.

is that worth all the damage it's causing? for a bit of middling entertainment?

think about the company you keep bro. altman? musk? amodei? trump?

[–] glitchdx@lemmy.world 0 points 4 days ago (2 children)

is that worth all the damage it’s causing? for a bit of middling entertainment?

No, it's not. But the damage is already done, and will be done regardless of anything I do. For the sake of argument, let's say I do stop using ai altogether. There will always be something that I'm not doing good enough to some people, one of my favorite examples is eating meat. It's delicious, and the vegans can kiss my ass. I still shop from amazon, other options are not practical. I work for a company that supports republican politicians, I have to pay rent somehow. I could continue.

think about the company you keep bro. altman? musk? amodei? trump?

I'm not keeping that kind of company. I have repeatedly and loudly insisted that those people deserve prison at best. The ai platform I currently use is not associated with any of the big ai companies, and I intend to switch to self hosting in the near future.


Something you should understand is that shit sucks. And sometimes, you can benefit from shit sucking. Taking advantage of shit sucking does not invalidate demands to make it not suck. I haven't said much about my disdain for the environmental impacts because on the subject of the environmental impact I agree with the neverslop side, but at the same time what the fuck am I supposed to do about it?

Here's an example for you. Recently, a friend of mine was involved in a car crash. Based on how the cars ended up, it looked like my friend was at fault. However, a flock camera caught the other party speeding into the intersection where the collision happened. Flock is a product of evil and needs to not exist, but between now and then we can sometimes take advantage of it.

[–] convectionfusion@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago

No, it’s not.

So you're simply going to suck AI dick even knowing the damage it's causing? That's an impressive amount of ignorance you've crammed into that pinhead of yours.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

you ride with those 4 every time you use any model that's built on theft. justify it however you need to sleep at night.

[–] glitchdx@lemmy.world 0 points 4 days ago (2 children)

You're delusional. Take your kitto coupon to the funhole, they love hating ai in all its forms there. I'm not interested in a cult echochamber.

[–] convectionfusion@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

What the actual fuck is a kitto coupon?

AI is making you nuts dude.

[–] glitchdx@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

You're on lemmy and you seriously don't know about funhole? you're missing out.

https://lemmy.sdf.org/c/funhole

Anyway, kitto coupons were a viral meme over there for a while (was pretty annoying, but I get it). I wanted to provide an example in this comment, but lemmy's search function sucks major ass (actually worse than reddit, and reddit's search has always been shit).

Anyway, don't blame memes being too niche for you on ai.

[–] convectionfusion@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

fuck ai, fuck them, fuck you, fuck funhole

[–] pmjv@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 20 hours ago
[–] pmjv@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Thanks for promoting Funhole! It's the only official safe space for AI artists on the internet!

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago

kitto coupon

not sure what you're smoking there. what the fuck are you rambling about promptboy?

[–] Bane_Killgrind@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Is he an unthinking npc now?

As the creator and leading expert on Linux, he's ultimately responsible for the project.

The NPCs have no responsibility, they are just there.

[–] GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The AI discourse is rather pointless when you see how much people are willing to bend their own opinions. So that it's always in the right, and one step further is the sloppery slope to hell

As you mentioned. Look at the Linux communities. Before Linus came out in support it was "Microslop" this "vibe coded OS" that. And now suddenly, AI is actually a good thing.

Or G*mers. On the one hand they're complaining about AI games being sold on Steam. But on the other hand they'll also defend Steam selling AI games. But on the other hand complain when Epic sells AI games. And then on the other hand they'll praise AI piracy and emulators.

[–] glitchdx@lemmy.world 11 points 5 days ago (2 children)

The AI discourse is rather pointless when you see how much people are willing to bend their own opinions. So that it’s always in the right, and one step further is the sloppery slope to hell

yup, guilty of that myself.

As you mentioned. Look at the Linux communities. Before Linus came out in support it was “Microslop” this “vibe coded OS” that. And now suddenly, AI is actually a good thing.

Both things are true. Linus has a proven track record of being good at his job and knowing what he's talking about. Microsoft has a proven track record of producing shit, and making their products worse. Giving them ai just makes them do what they were already doing faster. Linus speaking out didn't change my opinion on the matter, it only confirmed the current iteration of my opinions on ai that I've been slowly developing over the past few years.

Or G*mers. On the one hand they’re complaining about AI games being sold on Steam. But on the other hand they’ll also defend Steam selling AI games. But on the other hand complain when Epic sells AI games. And then on the other hand they’ll praise AI piracy and emulators.

Gamers as a collective are fucking morons. That aside, I don't hold all developers to the same standard. A solo dev with no funding is not the same as a 200 man team with the backing of a multi billion dollar publisher. Holding them both to the same standards is asinine. So if the next GTA/Elder Scrolls/Call of Duty/Final Fantasy/Whatever has vibe code or slop assets, gamers are absolutely right to rake those studios over the coals. They have the money to pay for programmers and artists. There is no excuse.

On the other hand, our nameless ideal solo dev who's struggling to so much as pay rent, fuckit go nuts. Vibe code the whole thing, slop out the assets, whatever. Just review the damn code, and curate the assets. If the project has any creative passion whatsoever, that will come through in how the slop is put together. I see using ai assets the same as using packaged assets from, say, the unity store: you didn't make it, but what's more important is how you use it.

And on ai piracy and emulators, I'm just tickled by the giant ai shaped middle finger pointed at nintendo and the ai companies.

[–] AliOski@feddit.nl 6 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Holy shit, you dropped this 👑

[–] glitchdx@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

I love external validation!

[–] liuther9@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

The main downside of Ai is expectation of speed. Everyone expects things to be done very fast. You have no time to do your own research, to learn how to do it and be confident that you have done it right

[–] SteveGoob@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago (2 children)

It sounds like, for the purposes of this post, you and many other people would not be in the "People who use AI" category:

All their responses are generated, no conscience there, just AI.

I have coworkers who are effectively meat proxies. I think the term NPC applies well to how interacting with these folks feels, since it does feel like I'm not talking to a real human, but a computer trying to appear human.

Is OPs net too wide? Probably, yeah. But the sentiment is real, the frustration is real, and contextualizing those interactions as with NPCs resonates.

Have your fun with using AI, but there's no need to yum our yuck.

[–] PatteBlanche@jlai.lu 6 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

How practical :

  • "everyone in this group is stupid"
  • "That's wrong"
  • "no but i only mean the stupid ones"
[–] GiveOver@feddit.uk 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Ah yes, the "Everyone is a true Scotsman" fallacy

[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 days ago

Something something the fallacy fallacy

[–] glitchdx@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago

Oh I'm right there with you (and op) in your annoyance with meat proxies. I just don't want to be lumped in with them. The amount of times I deal with someone telling me "chat gpt said I need xyz thing" and I have to explain that what they're asking for is impractical/impossible/expensive/doesn't exist. And then they get mad at me about it! Fuckers.