this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2026
250 points (79.3% liked)

Showerthoughts

44441 readers
877 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

All their responses are generated, no conscience there, just AI. "Another brick in the wall" hits stronger than ever now.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sheetzoos@lemmy.world 17 points 3 days ago (1 children)

People who use the internet are actual NPCs. I'm the only main character here.

[–] pmjv@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 6 hours ago
[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 27 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Citing “Another Brick In The Wall” is suspiciously generic and uncreative.

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 23 points 3 days ago

And not even relevant to OPs metaphor

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] glitchdx@lemmy.world 35 points 3 days ago (14 children)

This is exactly the kind of black and white reasoning that annoys me about online discourse. The camps of "neverslop" and "techbro shill" are extremely vocal, and squeeze out anyone in between with a nuanced opinion (like myself). And I know I'm not the only one because I get upvotes!

Fuck, Linus Torvalds uses ai. Is he an unthinking npc now? If anyone might be an authority on the ethical use of ai, it would be him.

"But Glitch, that's an appeal to authority fallacy!"

Okay, hypothetical strawman, you have a point.

Sure, there's people who exist who operate like how op describes. I'm not disputing that. But saying everyone who uses ai at all is braindead is both incorrect and insulting. I use ai for some shit, it's genuinely a somewhat useful tool and middling quality entertainment. But did ai write this comment? No, it did not, nor has ai told me what my opinions should be. So, proposal disproved by counterexample.

Someone is going to tell me I'm taking this too seriously, i can feel it.

[–] FunnyUsername@lemmy.world 20 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

this one time I had a huge 200 file folder full of ugly filenames i needed to be standardized to use in a script. Renaming them all manually was easily a 3 hour job at least. I described the end result name syntax i wanted and gave the full list of the current file names to an llm, and it gave me a powershell script that renamed every file for me perfectly in 2 minutes.

could i have coded that myself? sure. but then I'd be deciding between "three hours making a complicated file renaming script or 3 hours or manually renaming 200 files for 3 hours". The llm solved my problem for me and allowed me to continue with my actual work rather than wasting time doing data entry.

is this stupid npc behavior? if it is then it sure seems like only npc idiots like saving time.

[–] Peerpeer@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago

Yup, that is where I also use AI for. The boring stuff. Clicking on repeat for 3 hours and then it turns out you made a mistake and need to do it all over again. No thanks.

The creative things I do myself.

[–] glitchdx@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

I think that's perfectly reasonable, just review the script first for anything that might break your pc.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (8 children)

somewhat useful tool and middling quality entertainment.

is that worth all the damage it's causing? for a bit of middling entertainment?

think about the company you keep bro. altman? musk? amodei? trump?

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Bane_Killgrind@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Is he an unthinking npc now?

As the creator and leading expert on Linux, he's ultimately responsible for the project.

The NPCs have no responsibility, they are just there.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] expletivedeleted@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 days ago

I prefer "meat proxy".

[–] pinyaka@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Unless you're saying that people using ai is causing you to isolate yourself and bottle up your own feelings that's not the correct song to use.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 22 points 4 days ago (1 children)

ever spoken to a person that heavily uses llms, thier response is to use CHATGPT every single time.

[–] neomachino@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 3 days ago

I have a coworker who I used to bounce ideas off of all the time. Even just "hey am I over engineering this?", which was great. I don't have that anymore because the response is always "chat says .....". If I wanted to ask an llm why wouldn't I just do it myself?

[–] ramble81@lemmy.zip 13 points 4 days ago

My favorite is calling them meat proxies.

[–] XiELEd@piefed.social 25 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Maybe it's not about whether they are or are not NPCs, but the time they spend being as one. I also think spending time scrolling, having all your content delivered to you via an algorithm, also is kind of like spending time being an NPC.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] byungyoonc@piefed.ca 25 points 4 days ago (2 children)

A question for them: Why live anymore?
Okay, a bit more friendly version: where did you gave up living your own life?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago (6 children)

For those who say "what about ethical uses of AI?" and "but what if it actually useful?":

Two things can be true at the same time:

  1. Technology is legitimately useful.
  2. Technology is so harmful it shouldn't exist.

We didn't "cancel" asbestos for an all-around better material. We got rid of it wherever we could due to the harms of it. AI is harming our society, since it attempts to replace human communication with technology.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›