this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2026
121 points (96.9% liked)

Ask Lemmy

42364 readers
2132 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, toxicity and dog-whistling are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !uspolitics@lemmy.world


7) No Hit-and-Run questions.
Please don't delete your post for no apparent reason. If you plan on deleting a question later, say so in the post, or if you feel that you have a good reason to remove it, message a mod beforehand. It's not fair to the ones who took their time to answer, and it's not in the spirit of the community.


8) No Bots.
Posts or comments from bots, LLM's, AIs, Neural Networks, Transformers, or Marvin the Paranoid Android are not welcome in AskLemmy. Real humans only please.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I've been wondering this question for a while. Ignoring current events, why is a little bit of inflation desirable?

I do understand that it's done to "stimulate" the economy so people don't let their cash rot in a checking account, but isn't it a zero-sum game? Everybody says that money is not meant to stay where it is, rather, should flow through the economy. But if the economy always needs injections of liquidity because otherwise it fails, isn't the economy broken?

I feel like there's something I can't comprehend about that.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

I don't understand why you call it worse, or even bad at all.

your money buys more tomorrow than today

This is evidently good.

you hold off spending it

Also good. Save money for retirement and emergencies.

Done en masse, that causes demand to drop

Less consumerism. Good again.

companies have to lower prices further

Still good. More acquisitive power for consumers, less money for CEOs, stockholders, and similar parasites.

More incentive to increase production efficiency and reduce waste, while proper regulations and actually punitive fines and civil and criminal responsibility for executives, board members, and stockholders keep salaries and quality up.

The concept of infinite growth has been raping and murdering the world for way too long. This looks like it would put a hard stop to it.

which means more deflation

So far so good?

It's a self-perpetuating cycle

Sounds great, to be honest!

(Though, to be fair, prices would only keep lowering until goods are sold for what they actually cost to produce, including salaries and whatnot, with occasional drops due to increased efficiencies; the system would thus stabilise at an actually reasonable level, as opposed to the current ultraconsumerist madness.)

[–] blackberry28@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

Less demand = people getting laid off because now there's not enough work -> increase in unemployed -> fewer people paying taxes and social security stuff -> government can spend less which often leads to cuts in social security programs -> people can spend even less -> demand for products and services drops even further -> more layoffs -> cycle repeats

[–] Jimbabwe@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Think about your boss dropping your paycheck down to $200 a month (because money is so valuable now), but your rent is locked in at $1200 a month.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 days ago

I already get a real pay cut every year and a real rent increase every year. When we're below the annual pay cut, we just get fired.

[–] isleepinahammock@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You need to think more communally.

[–] leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Not wanting parasites to keep burning the world for short term profit is not thinking communally..?

[–] isleepinahammock@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That's obviously not what I'm referring to. I ignored the environmental stuff as I don't want to get off topic. Your points aren't invalid, but they are off topic. Try to focus please.

Back to the actual economics we're talking about. You're thinking only about the money going into your pocket. You're not thinking about the functioning of society as a whole. And you're not looking more than two inches in front of your face. The deflationary cycle is also self-perpetuating because it also involves cutting demand for not just goods, but labor. Look at the Great Depression if you want to see what a deflationary spiral looks like.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

As long as we don't encourage another Wall Street crash like 1929, we should be fine.

Edit: uh oh, liberal butthurt detected

[–] CrimeIsLegalNow@ani.social 2 points 2 days ago

What they should have said is that a system built on specific numbers going up to generate investment hype needs those numbers to keep going up and the easiest way to have the number go up is inflation.