this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

NFL

76 readers
7 users here now

A place for NFL news, game highlights and everything that excites you about American Football.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Lifesaboxofgardens@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (23 children)

Refs miss calls all the time.. nobody perfect. But holding an grabbing goes on every play. If they would’ve called it I wouldn’t be mad at all!

Full tweet. Basically what we all know, there could be a flag on every play.

[–] lapuertadepizza@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (8 children)

Should rules be subjective or objective?

[–] craicraimeis@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (4 children)

No sport will ever be perfectly objective. I think soccer is maybe the only one we can say can really minimize the impact of a ref but even that’s BS.

There needs to be some level of consistency between each ref crew but to think refereeing will ever be completely objective is unrealistic.

[–] AutisticNipples@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Baseball definitely the closest, a balk is probably the only call that can't be made objectively, but it's such a minor thing anyway.

[–] Wretched_Shirkaday@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

There's still a lot of rules in baseball that the written definition of what is and isn't rule breaking is left up to the umps judgement. Check swings, turning to second after reaching first, etc. Soccer has a lot less rules and they're less subjective. Plus MLB umps can just do whatever they want without repercussion.

[–] AutisticNipples@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

Agreed, but I think those things are easier to "make objective" in the rulebook than say determining what constitutes a legal/illegal tackle, what behavior deserves a yellow card, etc.

It's hard to officiate what one person is doing, but when you bring physical contact with another person into the mix, i feel like the complexity increases exponentially .

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)