this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2024
1569 points (98.6% liked)

Work Reform

10146 readers
267 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A future-of-work expert said Gen Zers didn't have the "promise of stability" at work, so they're putting their personal lives and well-being first.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Jakdracula@lemmy.world 100 points 11 months ago (3 children)

America isn’t a country, it’s just a business. That business minded model for society has drained all decency out of it. The US is a kleptocratic, psychopathic, oligarchy that has rotted out the brains of formerly decent people who have become the monsters we all see in stories like these. It will take multiple generations to fix this, if that is even possible.

[–] GrayBackgroundMusic@lemm.ee 41 points 11 months ago

America isn’t a country, it’s just a business

It's three businesses in a country sized trench coat.

[–] niktemadur@lemmy.world 28 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Your ~~brainwashed~~ mesmerized grandparents and their lazy non-voting baby boomer children let Reagan through the door in no uncertain terms, and in that environment the 80s "hostile corporate takeover" and junk bonds fever set in; with bottomless greed as the virus, which like herpes, seems to stick around forever.

EDIT: a word

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 2 points 11 months ago

Lazy voters stayed home and let Trump in. (With a strong assist from the Democratic party.). That's not what happened with Reagan. Reagan had incredibly broad popular support. I don't know if that's more or less damning of American voters, but no amount of additional turnout would have saved Carter.

[–] Chakravanti@sh.itjust.works 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It's not a psychopath. It's a sociopath.

[–] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago (2 children)

It's both.

Most CEOs match all the criteria for psychopathy or sociopathy

[–] fosforus@sopuli.xyz 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Clearly more than the average, but not "most". Last I remember the figure was something like 12%.

In a small company it sure makes a difference if your senior management are sociopaths, but if the company is large enough that you'll never see the CEO I'm not sure what difference does it make that he doesn't care about you personally.

those 12% are loud tho, and tend to shift the "company-overton-window" :-(

[–] Chakravanti@sh.itjust.works 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

You're just wrong. Psychopath is just a less skilled version of the same damn thing. They don't make it CEO's except that rare instance of inheriting the wealth. Then, sure, we get a great example of it like Elon. But then they're just that.

[–] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

As a diagnosed sociopath you have it completely backwards.

[–] Chakravanti@sh.itjust.works 0 points 11 months ago

You would say so wouldn't you?