this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2024
174 points (92.2% liked)

Selfhosted

40198 readers
1085 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
ruud@lemmy.world
Loki@lemmy.world
CannaVet@lemmy.world
HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world
devve@lemmy.world
HybridSarcasm@lemmy.hybridsarcasm.xyz
174
unRaid is NOT switching to a subscription model (unraid.net)
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world
58 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Per the pricing plan, all licenses are forever licenses, but the lowest two tiers only offer 1 year of updates.

After that you can choose to renew, or continue with your current version.

If you do not like subscriptions, there still a lifetime plan, but at a higher pricepoint.

All existing plans are grandfathered in.

Full announcement form Lime: https://unraid.net/blog/pricing-change

Note: I have mixed emotions about this, but I'm seeing a lot of rage bait, and if we're going to rage we might as well have our facts straight.

If you haven't subbed already and are interested, check out the unraid community at !unraid@reddthat.com. We are already discussing it over there too.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Shimitar@feddit.it 22 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Some of you guys are nahive.

The true and best open source stuff is not developed for profit. Once it is, its only a matter of time because, guess what, software development is never really profitable no matter how much you piss off your user base.

Don't get me wrong: nothing bad in seeking profit, I do it myself too, I don't live of thin air...

But true open source projects are not developed by seeking sustainability and profit out of it. I steer away from any such project because it's doomed sooner or later and history is full of those projects.

[–] Oddbin@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Naive/naïve?

I searched for "nahive" just in case it was a word I hadn't heard of but it doesn't seem to be.

[–] Shimitar@feddit.it 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yes, naïve :)

[–] rmuk@feddit.uk 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Did you know the world naïve is written backwards on your water bottle?

[–] Shimitar@feddit.it 1 points 9 months ago

Thats a good one! But I am not French.

[–] pulaskiwasright@lemmy.ml 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Software development is never profitable?

[–] Shimitar@feddit.it 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

For it to be, you need a solid paying user base. Which is not the case at hand.

Very often also at.enterprise level the big money is in training, support and courses rather than in the software licenses per se.

[–] Atemu@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 months ago

Well duh, most software these days doesn't have a direct license cost; you don't pay for the Netflix app on your TV, you pay for Netflix the service.

(Okay, Netflix might not be the best example for sustainable software-based profit but you get the idea.)