this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2024
483 points (98.2% liked)

News

35774 readers
2194 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sylver_dragon@lemmy.world 90 points 2 years ago (2 children)

While certainly an interesting development, this is just in a petri dish.

[–] Son_of_dad@lemmy.world 24 points 2 years ago (8 children)

Every science article, every single one. They always make things sound like breakthroughs and I have to come in the comments to find out it's bullshit or exaggerations. Why?

[–] affiliate@lemmy.world 25 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Why?

so that people click the link

[–] kratoz29@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago

Jokes on them, I did not, I just read the most popular Lemmy comment.

[–] Tyfud@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago

The truth is they use this as a way to secure additional funding, or show existing grants that progress is being made.

Whenever you feel the need to ask why in a capitalistic driven society, the answer usually ends up being: "money".

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Rtfm?

The headline is clickbait. The article ends with

“While these preliminary findings are very encouraging, it is premature to declare that there is a functional HIV cure on the horizon,” the researchers say.

I get more frustrated with articles like this than true clickbait. Here’s a genuine breakthrough in science, in an important health area: we should be excited, happy, inspired. Instead we’re annoyed by a misleading clickbait headline

[–] Enkrod@feddit.de 3 points 2 years ago

Tell me you didn't read the article without telling me you didn't read the article.

[–] mvirts@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

I think its to emphasize the importance of what seems small and boring out of context. Even though it may border on being misleading, I certainly would rather read extrapolations by informed journalists than be left not knowing which conclusions are important to me after reading a scientific publication.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Maybe view this stuff as a gradual accumulation not as a world changing event. As others ITT pointed out there was fuck all medical science could do about this disease in the era of Reagan Christians laughing about it. Now you can get it and live almost a normal life, provided you live in a wealthy country. The virus is dying not with a bang but with a whimper.

[–] capem@startrek.website 1 points 2 years ago

To be fair, every 'breakthrough' starts small and takes decades before reaching the public.

Lithium-ion batteries are my favorite example because we take them for granted but the technology to make them was proven in the 70s.