Technology

37712 readers

183 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

alyaza@beehaw.org

TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org

gyrfalcon@beehaw.org

rs5th@beehaw.org

SemioticStandard@beehaw.org

TheRtRevKaiser@kbin.social

Los@beehaw.org

coldredlight@beehaw.org

remington@beehaw.org

132

How G.M. Tricked Millions of Drivers Into Being Spied On (Including Me) (www.nytimes.com)

submitted 6 months ago by Gaywallet@beehaw.org to c/technology@beehaw.org

22 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] godzilla_lives@beehaw.org 31 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I will drive my 2003 Envoy I inherited into the ground, and after that it's a 2008 Camry, and then I'll ride that into the ground. Good God, if kid-me would have known adult-me would have turned into a Luddite..

[–] mox@lemmy.sdf.org 28 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children)

Luddite…

Avoiding spyware doesn't mean you're opposed to labor-saving technology, much as avoiding tasers doesn't mean you're opposed to electronics. :)

[–] brisk@aussie.zone 17 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Avoiding spyware doesn't mean you're opposed to labor-saving technology

Neither does being a Luddite

They confined their attacks to manufacturers who used machines in what they called “a fraudulent and deceitful manner” to get around standard labor practices. “They just wanted machines that made high-quality goods,” says Binfield, “and they wanted these machines to be run by workers who had gone through an apprenticeship and got paid decent wages. Those were their only concerns.”

[–] jkrtn@lemmy.ml 13 points 6 months ago

What the fuck, I have been brainwashed. Ludd et al were legit. We could have a really nice society but somehow the average person is irredeemably stupid to not join a movement such as that.

[–] mox@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

they wanted these machines to be run by workers who had gone through an apprenticeship and got paid decent wages.

A machine that avoids that can be called labor-saving, in the sense that it saves the employer from having to pay for skilled labor. I get the distinction you're making, and thanks for the article, but it really doesn't invalidate the use of the phrase.

Still a good clarification, though, and I side with the skilled labor on this one. :)

[–] godzilla_lives@beehaw.org 6 points 6 months ago

Yeah true, kid-me would be very proud that I'm opposed to anti-labor practices!

[–] Salvo@aussie.zone 5 points 6 months ago

There are legitimate uses for vehicle telemetry being stored by the vehicle and uploaded to the manufacturer.

Identifying unexpected behaviour under certain driving conditions and being able to contact emergency services in an accident are two important examples. Remote diagnosis in the case of a breakdown is another.

None of these uses include selling the data to third parties or using the data to create a profile of the vehicle owner.

[–] Salvo@aussie.zone 1 points 6 months ago

There is a difference between destroying looms, corrupting LLMs by feeding bad data and causing an uprising like the Butlerian Jihad of Dune or the Second Renaissance of The Matrix.