this post was submitted on 13 May 2024
263 points (87.0% liked)

News

23259 readers
4576 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A tiny, low-priced electric car called the Seagull has American automakers and politicians trembling.

The car, launched last year by Chinese automaker BYD, sells for around $12,000 in China, but drives well and is put together with craftsmanship that rivals U.S.-made electric vehicles that cost three times as much. A shorter-range version costs under $10,000.

Tariffs on imported Chinese vehicles probably will keep the Seagull away from America’s shores for now, and it likely would sell for more than 12 grand if imported.

But the rapid emergence of low-priced EVs from China could shake up the global auto industry in ways not seen since Japanese makers exploded on the scene during the oil crises of the 1970s. BYD, which stands for “Build Your Dreams,” could be a nightmare for the U.S. auto industry.

“Any car company that’s not paying attention to them as a competitor is going to be lost when they hit their market,” said Sam Fiorani, a vice president at AutoForecast Solutions near Philadelphia. “BYD’s entry into the U.S. market isn’t an if. It’s a when.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] shininghero@kbin.social 48 points 6 months ago (3 children)

I don't see a problem here. If the US auto makers are so worried, they should buy a few of them, copy their secrets, and sell them at a marked down price.
Turnabout is fair play, after all.

[–] vividspecter@lemm.ee 70 points 6 months ago (3 children)

They'd prefer to sell you a giant SUV or truck with massive profit margins and so they can continue to flout emissions standards.

[–] FigMcLargeHuge@sh.itjust.works 29 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Don't forget our big three are just chomping at the bit to get in on the subscription model. Oh, you want 'good' brakes, well that's $19.99/month. And there's no 'secrets' to the chinese cars, I am willing to bet that they are just selling them at a loss. It's not like they have to report real earnings to anyone.

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 18 points 6 months ago

They are just trying to kill the entire car industry. Which, at this point I could give a shit about. Car manufacturer seem to think that a car should be an investment… Except it depreciates.

Personally I’m not sure I would want that car as my only vehicle because I only have space for one car, but if I get a bigger place with a two car garage I would definitely be interested in a small electric car that doesn’t break my budget. I would probably use it 1/5 trips.

[–] RandomGen1@lemm.ee 9 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I saw an article somewhere on lemmy recently that had some commentary from an American tear-down r&d type shop that said they think BYD makes a small profit on them

[–] FigMcLargeHuge@sh.itjust.works 7 points 6 months ago

Very interesting. But the cynic in me says that even if we could tear it down and learn from it, we would manage to negate the savings with other costs. If they are making a profit, even if it's tiny, that would still negate the tin foil hat people from being able to say they are just using them in infiltrate our nation with their spying and devious ways. Well one would think, but tin foil hat people will find a way to work around that, because what's the best way to hide that you are infiltrating our nation then making it look like you are making a tiny profit. (Taps forehead..)

[–] chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

This is an EV. There isn't any emissions to be concerned about. At least not from the car itself.

[–] vividspecter@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago

Right, but it's easier to continue to flout those standards than to build a high quality and affordable EV, with comparable profit margins. And the marketing is easier ("You're not a real man without this giant truck!").

[–] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 2 points 6 months ago (2 children)

They sell what buyers want. Look at sales numbers of small cars versus everything else.

[–] towerful@programming.dev 17 points 6 months ago (1 children)

So small imported EVs aren't actually a threat, then?

[–] ShepherdPie@midwest.social -1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

They are a threat when they're sold well below cost due to the Chinese government's massive subsidies which make it impossible for any other non-Chinese manufacturer in the world to compete with them.

[–] Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Sounds like what buyers want is cheap cars then.

[–] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 0 points 6 months ago

Yeah just like they want cheap products when Walmart comes to town and before too long the local economy is in the crapper as all the town's revenue gets funneled to Arkansas.

What you're advocating for is a race to the bottom just so you can buy one (maybe two!) new car(s) instead of an affordable used car like most people do. Let China sell their cars here with the same subsidies that every other company qualifies for on a level playing field.

[–] interrobang@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Buyers do not want them, at least not anymore

They've been saying that axing the small sedan was to put money into EV. Seems they lied to pocket it, but we get nothing because free market capitalism is bullshit.

[–] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

That article simply states the sales of the Dodge Ram and Ford F150 were down last quarter and makes no mention of any other segment or manufacturer. Dodge hasn't made a small sedan since 2016 and Ford hasn't made one since 2020

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Huh, and I haven’t bought a vehicle from either since before then. What an amazing coincidence!

[–] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 1 points 6 months ago

They built pretty shitty cars anyways so its no great loss

[–] TomSelleck@lemm.ee 1 points 6 months ago (2 children)

The problem is the companies in China are backed by government funding that allows them to operate at a loss. To be clear, no governments should be spending public funds on propping up automotive companies. It’s a move to try and manipulate the market.

[–] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 14 points 6 months ago (2 children)

The problem is the companies in China are backed by government funding that allows them to operate at a loss.

So are the Big Three, every time they fail to see what's in front of their noses and get into trouble.

[–] Daveyborn@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

And they are setup for another fail right now, nothing but suvs on their lots and realistically gas has nowhere to go but up again.

Should've let them fall last time instead of the big bailouts.

[–] bob_lemon@feddit.de 7 points 6 months ago

nothing but suvs on their lots

Not true. They also have trucks

[–] ShepherdPie@midwest.social -3 points 6 months ago

Who are the Big Three to you? Dodge/Chrysler/Jeep is owned by a Scandanavian company.

[–] A7thStone@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

If that were actually the case wouldn't we want them sold here at a loss so we could drain resources from the Chinese government.

[–] draughtcyclist@lemmy.world -1 points 6 months ago

Someone has to pay for the R&D to make EV's possible. So far, that's not BYD. It's been US and European countries.