this post was submitted on 20 May 2024
1598 points (97.2% liked)

Technology

59608 readers
5589 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
  • Linus Torvalds, creator of Linux, does not believe in cryptocurrencies, calling them a vehicle for scams and a Ponzi scheme.
  • Torvalds was once rumored to be Bitcoin creator Satoshi Nakamoto, but he clarified it was a joke and denied owning a Bitcoin fortune.
  • Torvalds also dismissed the idea of technological singularity as a bedtime story for children, saying continuous exponential growth does not make sense.
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kn98@feddit.nl 11 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (5 children)

I only like two cryptocurrencies.

Nano: free transactions, each wallet runs it’s own blockchain, so it’s got no negative impact on the environment.

Monero: allows for anonymous transfers

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 11 points 6 months ago (7 children)

I ask this sincerely, what have you personally needed an anonymous currency for?

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 16 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I use anonymous currency daily without issue. It's called cash.

[–] xthexder@l.sw0.com 11 points 6 months ago (2 children)

You can't use cash online tho

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 14 points 6 months ago (1 children)

You just have to fold it really small to poke it down the wires.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

True. Although you can put cash on a debit card and spend that online. Pseudo anonymous because there is some degree of traceability.

[–] Aux@lemmy.world -2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

In which fairy tale cash is anonymous?

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

All fairy tales. Stories are awash with bags of coins and no-one ever worries who owned the cash previously.

[–] Aux@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, tell that to the officers who investigate fake cash and money laundering.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Sorry. Which fairy tales have officers who investigate fake cash and money laundering?

Neither of which have anything to do with the anonymity of cash.

[–] EngineerGaming@feddit.nl 13 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

I used Monero to pay for my domain and VPS while under sanctions and thus failed by the mainstream payment system. And in daily life I use pretty much only cash.

Also the phrasing of this implies some "nothing-to-hide" mentality. Would I be in danger if I paid for my stuff with a KYC method? Not really, I connect to my VPS and request my domain daily from home, their existence is not secret. Do I benefit from the transaction being anonymous? Still yes, the less data you trust the third parties with, the better. Same as to why I encrypt my chats even though they are mundane. Just because they are nobody's business.

[–] itsmect@monero.town 1 points 6 months ago

nothing-to-hide

In most civilized countries the law is "innocent until proven guilty" - and if I (and the vast majority of people) are innocent, why the fuck is tracking a thing?

[–] shortwavesurfer@monero.town 11 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Buying groceries. Personally, I guess I don't need an anonymous cryptocurrency, but why wouldn't you have an anonymous cryptocurrency? That would be the equivalent of letting everybody in the world see your bank account and your withdrawals and deposits. And who would do that? That and while people would like you to believe otherwise, you still have a right to privacy.

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

In the case of groceries, use cash? I understand the overall privacy issue, and I don’t fall into the “I have nothing to hide so why should I care” category, but I struggle to find a real world example of where an anonymous digital currency would be required outside of illegal purchases. There are certainly “illegal” purchases that shouldn’t be illegal, depending on your area. Birth control will be a big one.

[–] Mo5560@feddit.de 9 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The obvious one is buying drugs. I don't feel like arguing the morality of doing that but anonymous money is definitely useful for that.

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago

I’ve bought drugs online and in person so don’t worry about judgement. Drugs are fun.

[–] witx@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I read somewhere that someone was using anonymous currencies to buy life saving medicine from "non traditional" markets because they were much much cheaper. Let me see if I find the article

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 4 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Well, that might be the only form of payment they take, and so you’ve got to use it I suppose. But the anonymous part really isn’t a huge factor here.

I would be a little cautious of buying “non traditional” medication from someone who doesn’t want a paper trail.

Unless you mean drugs, and then yes a paper trail is bad haha.

[–] witx@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Haha no drugs in that article at least. I can't find it but I think it was either for diabetes or asthma

[–] itsmect@monero.town 1 points 6 months ago

In most countries it's illegal to purchase or sell non-OTC medicine without a doctors note (buyer) and license (seller). Even if government doesn't care, I'm sure that big pharma would like to keep their profit margins.

[–] itsmect@monero.town 3 points 6 months ago

My preferred lemmy instance is funded with xmr.

[–] kn98@feddit.nl 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

I like it as a way to donate to creators without revealing my identity. It comes close to handing over cash.

You could also use it to pay for a VPN, but since the VPN provider sees your original IP address anyways, I don’t think that’s useful.

[–] EngineerGaming@feddit.nl 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Another use I can think of is paying for a domain and registering it with fake info. Registrars require pretty sensitive information, and apparently can check if it is real by comparing it to the info tied to a card used to pay, which crypto eliminates.

Wish there were more XMR-accepting registrars though.

[–] itsmect@monero.town 2 points 6 months ago

One time phone numbers are another good thing, to avoid the ever increasing tracking we are all exposed to.

[–] itsmect@monero.town 1 points 6 months ago

Love it for donations. Monero specifically is also super fast: open wallet, scan QR, enter amount, hit send. Easily done in 30s or less.

It's also good for VPNs, because now the VPN provider needs to figure out who owns the IP, rather then looking up the clear name in the payment info. Doesn't make you anonymous, but reduces risk of data brokers buying your personal info.

[–] Laser@feddit.de 3 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Omg we're cryptocurrency twins. I hold exactly these two for the same reasons

[–] lemming741@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] Laser@feddit.de 1 points 6 months ago

Mostly holding Nano, used Monero quite often - should probably spend some Nano at one point... But vendors accepting it here are rare

[–] shortwavesurfer@monero.town 2 points 6 months ago

I only use Monero, but still, it's a very good one.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Isn't Nano the one where they distributed the coins by CAPTCHA, but there was a central party that verified all these CAPTCHAs? They could just have given themselves 51% of the coins for free.

[–] kn98@feddit.nl 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Initial distribution was through a captcha-protected crypto ‘faucet’. The faucet is still up. Did the developers keep a large part of the coins themselves? I’ve never heard that.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 months ago

There's no way to audit that.

[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago

What about ETH? It also doesn't use electricity.