this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2024
178 points (98.9% liked)

News

23296 readers
5464 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Is it nuts to assume a scoop of pistachio ice cream should contain actual pistachios? Or how about real butter in a dish of butter pecan? 

Such weighty questions about a favorite summertime confection could soon be decided by the courts.

A federal judge in New York has given the go-ahead to a Long Island woman’s class action lawsuit that claims consumers are being duped by Cold Stone Creamery when they purchase certain flavors that “do not contain their represented ingredients.”

Lead plaintiff Jenna Marie Duncan purchased her serving of pistachio ice cream from a Cold Stone Creamery store in Levittown, New York, in or around July 2022. According her lawsuit, Duncan “reasonably believed that the Pistachio ice cream she purchased from defendant contained pistachio.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] iopq@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Zero sugar is a correct label in that case

[–] Kraven_the_Hunter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

So is "artificially sweetened", "natural sweeteners added" or any host of other, more useful descriptors.

Product nutrition labels are not the place for "it's technically correct" phrasing.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

So is “artificially sweetened”,

That description doesn't communicate if there is any sugar (calories) in it or not. That label would be accurate on a zero calorie or full calorie beverage.

The term you're looking for is "unsweetened". That tells you there's no natural or artificial sweeteners in it.

[–] Kraven_the_Hunter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I understand this. My point is "zero sugar" and "no sugar" are obtuse terms and much better ones exist.

Using a man-made sweetener? Call it artificially sweetened.

Using a natural sweetener other than sugar? Say so, it's not hard and also less of a misdirection than the phrasing they like to use.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I think you're looking at these labels thinking they are there to solve your problem of labeling a beverage that isn't sweet (by any means). They aren't.

These labels are there because most buyers of beverages are interested in if they contain calories or not. So the "zero sugar" clearly solves that.

Unless enough buyers are like you that they are seeking an unsweetened beverage, you're out of luck looking for every beverage to be labeled as "sweet" or "not sweet".

[–] Kraven_the_Hunter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

You're probably right. Part of the reason it sets me off is because I assume they're doing it on purpose. Maybe they are and I'm (partially) justified and maybe I'm attributing malice to stupidity or however that saying goes.

Fortunately this is a relatively infrequent occurrence as I've found the products I like. But god damn does it upset me when I pick up the wrong thing.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Maybe they are and I’m (partially) justified and maybe I’m attributing malice to stupidity or however that saying goes.

I don't think they're trying to trick people into drinking sweet drinks. I think they're trying to appeal to their largest customer base (calorie conscious buyers). There is limited attention buyers have, so drink makers have to be careful not to put too much, so their most important parts of their message get through. In this case "zero sugar". They are probably aware that some people like yourself end up with something you don't like, but they just don't care because it doesn't negatively effect enough people for their sales to suffer.

So not really malice, or stupidity on their part, but apathy. They likely know, they just don't care.