this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2024
438 points (99.1% liked)

News

23644 readers
4029 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Yellowstone National Park officials say a gunman killed by park rangers as he fired a semiautomatic rifle at the entrance of a dining facility with 200 people inside had told a woman he planned to carry out a mass shooting

The warning from a woman in Yellowstone National Park came in just after midnight on July Fourth: She'd just been held at gunpoint by a man who said he planned to carry out a mass shooting — a random attack common in the U.S. these days but not in the Yellowstone region, let alone the park itself.

Rangers spent the next several hours trying to find the gunman before he showed up outside a dining area with 200 people inside. He shot a barrage of bullets with a semi-automatic rifle at a service entrance.

The rangers — including one who was wounded — shot back. Their rounds hit the attacker, Samson Lucas Bariah Fussner, 28, of Milton, Florida, who died at the scene in the busy Canyon Village tourist lodge area near the scenic Grand Canyon of Yellowstone.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] foggy@lemmy.world 61 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I'm not much for 2A bullshit but homie...

You went to YELLOWSTONE to attempt a mass shooting.

Do you honestly think there is a soul that resides nearby that doesn't have wet dreams about taking someone like you down every night?

Good riddance.

[–] notabot@lemm.ee 46 points 5 months ago (2 children)

There's a fair chance he knew that and wanted to die while killing as many as possible.

As you said, good riddance.

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I believe this to be the motives behind most mass shootings. They know they are going to die.

It's about getting their name printed on newspapers, shown in the news, talked about for a few days before the cycle repeats.

We would be better served if the news simply referred to the shooter as "an assailant" and never say their names.

[–] notabot@lemm.ee 7 points 5 months ago

Absolutely. If they're killed during their crime they should be completely anonymous. No names, no 'manifestos', no reference to the sorts of communities they were part of online, no last words, just, 'they were a vile stain on humanity' and then forgotten. Obviously, if they live more will come out as they're prosecuted, but that should be minimized and once they're jailed they can be forgotten by all but those tasked with keeping them alive to serve their sentence.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

That's what I mean though...

You don't go to what is essentially the actual 'wild wild west' for that shit and not expect to get Dirty Harry'd before you succeed.

[–] otterpop@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

While I agree that the surrounding area would be well armed, ~~I believe firearms in the park itself are actually banned for civilians.~~ (Wrong, see below) This is a rare case of a police force stopping an active shooter quickly.

[–] GluWu@lemm.ee 6 points 5 months ago (2 children)

That is false, firearms have been legal to carry in national parks since 2010.

[–] otterpop@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Oh dang really? Thanks for the correction I need to update my knowledge here.

[–] otterpop@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

"In areas administered by the National Park Service, an individual can possess a firearm if that individual is not otherwise prohibited by law from possessing the firearm and if the possession of the firearm complies with the laws of the state where the park area is located. 54 U.S.C. 104906. "

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

Thanks Obama 😒