this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2024
141 points (83.4% liked)

Selfhosted

40006 readers
646 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
ruud@lemmy.world
Loki@lemmy.world
CannaVet@lemmy.world
HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world
devve@lemmy.world
HybridSarcasm@lemmy.hybridsarcasm.xyz
141
I spent ~$35 on new cables and my LAN speed increased 6x (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 3 months ago by anonymouse2@sh.itjust.works to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world
69 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

After seeing that my wireless speeds were much faster than the speeds I was getting over Ethernet, I decided to invest in some new cables. I didn't know it before, but I saw while I was changing them out that my current cables were Cat 5e. While putting my network together, I had just been grabbing whatever cables I could find in my scrap drawers. Now I have Cat 8 cables and my speeds jumped from 7MB/s to an average of over 40MB/s. It's a much bigger improvement than I expected, especially for such a small investment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Presi300@lemmy.world 25 points 3 months ago (2 children)

CAT8 40MB/s

I think you went a but overkill with that one, high quality CAT6 cables would have done the same job, but hey, if it works, it works.

[–] hedidwot@lemmynsfw.com 25 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

High quality cat 5e would have done the job.

Original cables must have been faulty.

[–] Presi300@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I mean, all of my cables are CAT 5e and I can easily pull a gigabit down and up from my NAS... Which has a gigabit NIC, so ig you're right.

[–] hedidwot@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 2 months ago

Yep. There was an assumption 20 years ago when common switches were 100Mbps and running cat5e that you'd have to upgrade cable to get the next speed tier, 1Gbps.

It propagated wildly, but was always incorrect. Cat5e was very much capable of gigabit Ethernet by design.

It was only beyond gig that you'd need cat6, and even then at short lengths 2.5/5/10Gbe has a good chance of working on cat5e anyway (but don't do it).

[–] majestictechie@lemmy.fosshost.com 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Atleast it's future proof

[–] TCB13@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The future of ethernet is not expensive cabling, more like switches capable of doing more on current cables. We've been seeing this trend for a while.

[–] majestictechie@lemmy.fosshost.com 3 points 3 months ago

I know, I was just tryna point out the silver lining