this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2024
1011 points (97.6% liked)

Fuck Cars

9630 readers
415 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 52 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Fun fact: school buses in the US are legally allowed to ignore posted weight limits on bridges. While this may seem particularly insane, usually on bridges the posted weight limit is not the weight that will make the bridge instantly collapse, it's the weight that if regularly exceeded by crossing vehicles will cause undue wear and require the bridge to be repaired or replaced sooner than it otherwise would have been. School buses are infrequent enough (and relatively light enough, even despite the child obesity epidemic) that they don't create a significant problem.

On a wooden bridge like this, though, the same logic does not apply. I sure wouldn't cross it in my school bus, but the height limit would preclude that anyway.

[–] Th3D3k0y@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I was going to say, even if the bus was over the limit on weight for this thing it wouldn't clear the roof, but then you said that at the end.

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Oh, it would clear the roof all right - it just wouldn't be a covered bridge any more.

[–] Th3D3k0y@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

School Bus: look at this cool hat I found

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 3 points 2 months ago

Engineers hate this one trick

[–] Malfeasant@lemm.ee 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Or the bridge would still be covered, but your bus wouldn't...

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Well, school bus bodies are a lot stronger than people think (I say this as someone that's rebuilt one as a skoolie) but so are wooden structures. I'd pay good money to find out whether school bus or covered bridge roof would win in a fight. I think the reality is that they'd both come out of it in pretty bad shape - but the kids would be fine.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

reality chiming in:

both would be fucked.

[–] Aeri@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Even though a school bus takes the same route every day?