this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2024
104 points (79.9% liked)

News

22890 readers
3743 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The world’s most important knowledge platform needs young editors to rescue it from chatbots – and its own tired practices

Established in 2001, Wikipedia is an “old man” by internet standards. But the role it plays in our collective knowledge of the world remains astonishing. Content from the free internet encyclopedia appears in everything from high-school term papers and pub trivia questions to search engine summaries and voice assistants. Tools like Google’s AI Overviews and ChatGPT rely heavily on Wikipedia, although they rarely credit the site in their responses.

And therein lies the problem: as Wikipedia’s visibility diminishes, reduced to mere training data for AI applications, it also loses prominence in the minds of readers and potential contributors. When someone notices a topic that is poorly described on Wikipedia, they might feel motivated to correct it. But this can-do spirit goes away when the error comes through an AI summary, where the source of the information isn’t clear.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 57 points 1 week ago (25 children)

AI Chat bots could easily refer to their source. But the companies that own the chat bots don't wanna do that.

[–] BreadstickNinja@lemmy.world 58 points 1 week ago (6 children)

It's actually not easy to ensure that an LLM will cite a correct source, in the same way it's not easy to ensure that it will provide accurate information. It's based on token probability, not deterministic lookups of "this data came from this source." It could entirely make something up, then write "Source:" and then probabilistically write "Wikipedia" because those tokens commonly follow those for "Source."

If you have an AI bot that looks up information in real time, then that would be easy. But for a trained LLM, the training process is highly destructive. Original information is not preserved except in relationships based on probability.

[–] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The more I learn about AI, the less I like it.

[–] BreadstickNinja@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It's a fun toy. It's not a research aid, it's not a productivity tool, and it's not particularly useful in the workplace.

It's honestly very similar to the VR craze of a few years back. Silicon Valley invented a fun toy and then tried to convince everyone that it would transform the workplace. Meetings in VR and simulated workstations and all that. Ultimately everyone figured out that VR is completely useless in the workplace and Silicon Valley was just trying to find ways to sell their fun toy. Now we're going through the same learnings with AI.

[–] med@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I love VR. I have so many hours in some of the slower paced fps titles that it's almost matched my video game time total for non-vr games on steam.

The one thing I learned for sure is that I don't want anyone else telling me when I have to put on the headset and when I'm allowed to take it off.

Never will wear a vr headset in the workspace.

[–] BreadstickNinja@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Oh yeah, I love my Index as well. I think it's a lot of fun as a gaming device. But the big money is in B2B sales, which is why tech companies try to convince everyone that blockchain/VR/LLMs have all these corporate applications that just make no damn sense.

[–] TherapyGary@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It's actually extremely useful as a productivity tool in many workplaces. You're just stating how you feel about it as if it's fact for everyone

[–] PlantJam@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

I personally use LLMs in the workplace. It's great for generating boilerplate code, especially stuff that is often very repetitive like test classes.

[–] BreadstickNinja@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

It's a great way to replace competent human workers with a lower-cost, lower-quality alternative. Wall Street may buy that anti-worker BS but workers tell a different story.

Literally an article in Forbes today that says 77% of employees report that AI tools make them less productive: https://www.forbes.com/sites/torconstantino/2024/09/12/77-of-surveyed-employees-say-ai-tools-make-them-less-productive/

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Right, in my experience the majority of URLs generated by LLMs are just jumbles of letters that vaguely look like a URL. A fundamental architecture difference needs to happen in one way or another to properly cite sources, and it’s really bad for performance.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I choose to interpret the grandparent commenter's use of "easily" to mean "not impossible, and an ethical obligation, so you'd better fuckin' make it a priority."

[–] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

That's accurate. Nothing in technology is actually "easy" and I know it requires a lot of work. Didn't mean to diminish all the time and energy put into making this stuff. Thanks for better expressing what I meant.

[–] suigenerix@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

perplexity.ai does a decent job at providing sources for searches.

[–] mindlight@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Maybe specifying source should be a legal requirement if the LLM service provider shouldn't automatically be held accountable for the answers their services produce?

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 week ago

Yeah Bing Chat had sources for a while (not sure if it still does) and when I checked the sources, the frequently didn't contain the claim in question. So even if you get it to cite real pages, it just doesn't work the same way as human citations do.

load more comments (18 replies)