this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2024
334 points (99.4% liked)

News

37602 readers
2503 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/19704884

A Purdue University student thought he kicked his way to a two-year car lease for making three field goals in a contest held during the Boilermakers’ season opener in West Lafayette. However, the dealership sponsoring the giveaway later reneged on the deal because of a technical. The final kick – a 40-yarder – left his foot just a split second too late on August 31. Car dealerships really cannot help but be bastards, can they?

...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 69 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Just so you know how this stuff works... Dealers don't pay for this out of pocket. They pay for "prize insurance" in case someone wins and the insurance pays out.

In this case, what looks like happened is the insurance company reviewed the footage and went "Nope, not paying." Which then fell back on the dealership to make good.

Source: Was a judge on a "hit a hole in one, win a Cadillac!" at a golf tournament. Someone did, in fact, hit a hole in one on my hole and won the car.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 32 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It wasn't even he won a car, either. It was a two-year lease. Also

To get out of some of the responsibility for this PR fuck up, the group attributed the issue to an insurance company...In a post on LinkedIn, Trey Rohrman said Spangler missed winning the Kicks for Cash contest by 0.07 seconds...

Dealerships, insurance companies, they ask really are dirty.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 2 years ago (1 children)

If the video was 30 fps, sounds like two frames

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It was from several different angles, from four? Cams with discrepancies between them.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Jeez, I wonder if they accounted for the rolling shutter to get higher time resolution

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I know zip about photography, could you explain, please?

[–] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Oh, this'll blow your mind. Digital cameras don't capture the entire image all at once. They typically capture one row of pixels at a time, so each row comes from a different moment in time.

So the point I was alluding to is that two adjacent frames in a video carry slightly more timing information than they might appear to based on timestamps.

Specifically, if you have two frames where a dot appears at the bottom and then a second dot appears at the top, you can't be 100% certain that the first dot to appear actually showed up first, or whether it's an artifact of the rolling shutter effect.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rolling_shutter

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 7 points 2 years ago

I'll check out the wiki, but your explanation is pretty simple to understand and concise! Well done and thanks so much!

ETA: just read it. Those distortions in the propeller and helicopter blades are wild. While not being a fan of car dealerships, I'm also not a fan of insurance companies. It would be fascinating to know the answer to this mystery.