Ask Lemmy
A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions
Please don't post about US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world
Rules: (interactive)
1) Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
2) All posts must end with a '?'
This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
3) No spam
Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.
4) NSFW is okay, within reason
Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com.
NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].
5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions.
If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.
Partnered Communities:
Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu
view the rest of the comments
Out of interest, has anyone here been using Kagi? It's a premium search engine, which means it has reasons and resources to not suck, in theory. Kind of interested in trying it, but not sure how good it actually is.
I've been using Kagi for the better part of a year. I find it removes about 2/3 of the time and effort between search and goal. There are a lot of very simple quality of life things that every search should have (and would have if not for user tracking).
Some people have fairly said that paid search is inherently privacy unfriendly. You have to log in to use it. That doesn't really bother me, and if it doesn't bother you, it's great to use a quality search where you are not the product.
That's the kicker for me. It's possible they log your entire search history which is disturbing.
I looked into it before I started using it like a year ago. They count the number of searches but claim to not hold actual search queries. I don't have a citation handy (it has been a year...) but even if that's untrue (which I don't think it is, but hypothetically) and they were found to be using it to tweak their engine, meh? I search for memes, accounts for art/porn, games/reviews, etc. I'm not searching for my home address or anything of interest or value. "hey, the horny furry searched for more horny furry stuff" is like "water is still wet, more at 10".
This is a super low-important possibility, imo.
I have. It didn't seem ridiculously priced and the results have included what I want the majority of the time. No complaints so far, and it's been about six months.
I've been using it for a number of months now and have been really happy with it. I think it saves me time and aggravation compared to using Google.
There's a trial, you get a handful of searches per month for free
I think it's just a flat 100 searches trial, not per month. Of course you could use another burner email if you wanted to game the system but I think it's worth paying for.
Try it, they give you 100 free searches.
I've been using it for months and really like it. It's so refreshing to get clean and useful search results.
I've been using it for over a year. It makes my life easier, to be honest. I'm on the 5€ plan because I don't need more than 300 searches per month.
I like how customisable the search results are, the lack of SEO stuff and I'm a big fan of the "small internet" results.
I do. Just the feature where I block domains and they pop up in the results when I search something is a reason to pay for it for me.
And people voting down those spam sites means that you also won't get them in your results. 5/5
I tried Kagi and found the results to be significantly less helpful than Google. Searches for local businesses, open source libraries, and Canadian history missed useful sites that Google provided.
I guess I'm an outlier, because other people seem to have a good time with it.
No, I have the same experience. Especially if you want to search for local stuff in my country. It is like my country (Netherlands) does not exist Kagi.
For general topics it is ok I guess. I do have premium but I am barely using it anymore. I use Qwant.
I've been using Kagi for a while and would not hesitate in recommending it to anyone BUT with the caveat if you want to search for a local business or similar, at least here in the UK, then it's pretty rubbish... I find Google still reigns at that.
I couldn't live without it. Love being able to up/down-rate my results. I've been trying to de-google my life but search was always the one thing I couldn't give up. DuckDuckGo being Bing results just didn't have the quality. Kagi's results are S tier. As I understand it, they're sourced in a privacy friendly way from Google and then they apply your preferences on top of them. Definitely went in skeptical and now I can't imagine not having Kagi.
I am somewhat tempted to sign up and give it a shot. DDG is pretty solid for me, but it would be interesting to try a search engine where I'm not the product, it is.
I've been using kagi for months. I love it.
Super impressed so far
I use it. I like it and would recommend it.