this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2024
492 points (96.4% liked)

linuxmemes

20774 readers
1242 users here now

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:

Community rules

  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rtxn@lemmy.world 43 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Did they invent X11 Forwarding over the network?

[–] Samsy@lemmy.ml 29 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Btw. when we get wayland forwarding over Network?

[–] potentiallynotfelix@lemdro.id 31 points 1 day ago (1 children)

waypipe exists, but it's still not perfect.

[–] Samsy@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 day ago

Never heard about this. Thx.

[–] d_k_bo@feddit.org 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Unlike X11, Wayland was never intended to be network transparent. As others say, solutions like waypipe and more tradionally RDP and VNC exist.

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Exactly. We won’t. We’ll get specialized video stream over network. I’m not happy about this regression. I understand that was a willing sacrifice to achieve better local performance, but I’m not sure it was worth it.

[–] MinFapper@startrek.website 4 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Their reasoning was that X11 network transparency had been broken for quite some time. If you tried running chrome, most games, or anything with modern hardware acceleration over X11 forwarding, they wouldn't work.

So, IMHO waypipe is actually an improvement in terms of compatibility, rather than a regression.

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 3 points 19 hours ago

You always had the option to send frames over the net using VNC and such. But for many use cases, X over SSH was absolutely fantastic.

I remember using it on a very basic DSL connection to work remotely back in 2005, and it was almost like running local. You don’t get anywhere near the same performance with VNC or RDP.

[–] Petter1@lemm.ee 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It’s more about security if I recall correctly

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How so? Is there a way for malicious code to start injecting itself into calls to 127.0.0.1?

[–] Petter1@lemm.ee 2 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

Sorry, I am not an expert myself, but I think there are some recourses about that in the internet

Or, this file on x.org:

“But the X protocol is still unsecure by design…”

https://www.x.org/wiki/Events/XDC2014/XDC2014DodierPeresSecurity/xorg-talk.pdf

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 3 points 19 hours ago

Yeah, to send it naked over the wire would be nuts, which is why everybody uses SSH. But unless there’s insecurity within the computer, that’s a moot point.

[–] db2@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Btw. when we get wayland ~~forwarding over Network~~?

/c/foundthenvidiauser

[–] lurch@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

X11 can render individual windows (Xclients) through the network on another Xserver since decades. With XPRA you can even buffer them, to move them from one Xserver to another or make sure they survive network disconnect. It's very cool, but not widely used.

[–] potentiallynotfelix@lemdro.id 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yes, the ssh -X flag forwards it.

[–] rtxn@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I doubt it's nearly as secure as OpenSSH though.

[–] lurch@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 day ago

it goes through an SSH tunnel