this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2024
978 points (99.4% liked)

People Twitter

5225 readers
2604 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 month ago (4 children)

till (today I learned) some people say G - U - I and not gooey

[–] Halosheep@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I've always said the letters and was surprised when I heard someone say 'gooey' when I entered college.

Still don't like it.

[–] variants@possumpat.io 6 points 1 month ago

no one likes being wrong

[–] Sabre363@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago

The first time I heard the term gooey it was from someone I don't like so now I can't stand it. All I can think about is buying that dude a toothbrush, but then he'd probably go on about how toothbrushes are actually bad for your health.

[–] SmoothLiquidation@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

At my last job I helped design VUIs, voice user interface. We called them “vooeys”.

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (3 children)

some people say G - U - I

It should be that way always, frankly, I don't know why gooey even got started. Something "gooey" is the last thing I'd want associated with computer stuff

But I loathe all of the stupid attempts at shoehorning pronunciations of initialisms where it doesn't belong

It's not "Sequel" its fucking S-Q-L. They're all initialisms. I will go through my entire IT career and die on this hill.

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Do you say J-P-E-G instead of jay-peg?

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world -2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

No because jay-peg actually makes sense and fits well, just like NASA makes sense and fits well. You can say NASA and JPEG without having to introduce additional letters to make it work. Unlike "Gooey", "Sequel", or "Scuzzy" which all require the addon of more letters to actually work

You can just see JPEG and intuitively go "Oh Jay-PEG" you can't say the same for SCSI

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You have to "add" letters for JPEG to be pronounceable.

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Where? you can pronounce "J" 2 ways. "Je" and "Jay"

"PEG" stands on its own, and it's also a word, "peg"

So when you pronounce Jay-PEG you're just sounding out the "J" and pronouncing the word "PEG". No letters have been added to make it pronounceable

In contrast to "Sequel"/SQL where you need to add a vowel "e" and a consonant "u" to get "sequel"

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You literally added the A and the Y to say "jay."

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

LMAO that was just for easier visualization of the pronunciation of the letter J

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J

Its usual name in English is jay (pronounced /ˈdʒeɪ/)

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

And you're not saying "Jay Pee Ee Gee."

Why make a bizarre exception for one letter?

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

See previous reply:

"PEG" stands on its own, and it's also a word, "peg"

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

See previous comment:

And you're not saying "Jay Pee Ee Gee."

Why make a bizarre exception for one letter?

Do you pronounce GIF "Gee-if?"

[–] SmoothLiquidation@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I suppose you called them small computer system interface drives instead of SCSI drives too.

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I just say S-C-S-I instead of "Scuzzy" or whatever it is

Everyone says H-T-T-P, why don't they say "Hettep"‽

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Nah, it's scuzzy.

And when I'm trolling, I say "huh-tu-tu-puh" for HTTP.

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

To get Scuzzy you have to fundamentally modify SCSI and break a few grammatical rules

In English, "S" before a consonant typically retains its standard /s/ sound (as in "stop" or "snow"). Pronouncing "SCSI" as "Scuzzy" violates this by softening the second "S" into a /z/ sound before the consonant "Z," which doesn't follow the rule where "S" remains /s/ unless a voicing context (such as between two vowels) alters it.

English has rules governing when consonants are "soft" (like "S" becoming /z/) or "hard" (like "C" becoming /k/). In "SCSI," these letters maintain their distinct pronunciations, but when forced into "Scuzzy," the "C" becomes part of a hard /sk/ sound, and the second "S" is softened into /z/. These changes are not guided by typical English consonant-hardening rules, especially since "SCSI" does not include the contextual elements that normally trigger these shifts (e.g., vowel placement following "C" in certain cases).

You also have to add whole new vowels like "u" and "y"

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The C is hard because the second word is "Computer." The O in "Computer" becomes a "u" sound because "scossy" sounds odd.

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Irrelevant, acronyms and initialisms don't depend on the underlying words they stand for beyond the first letter of each word. You can't use the word underlying C or any of the other letters for grammatical justification or pronunciation.

Each letter must stand on its own and be governed by pronunciation rules independently of its underlying word, if it cannot form a sensible pronounceable word (Like FBI, CIA, SQL, SCSI) on its own it's an initialism. If it can (Like NASA) then it's an acronym.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Nah, there are no such rules, like anything else, initialisms are defined by speakers of the language, and that's what industry professionals seem to use most often.

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

what industry professionals seem to use most often.

Lol ok, if you want to change to that set of rules, I am an industry professional. Fairly deep into my IT career, and I will absolutely get on to any of my people if I see "Scuzzy" (Not that that particular one will ever come up again, fairly out of date lmao) or "Sequel" or any of that other bull

Maybe it's a regional thing, or maybe you're just a hothead, hard to tell.

Either way, in my region, "scuzzy" and "sequel" are the dominant pronunciations for SCSI and SQL in my field.

[–] Atherel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago

Don't even start with PCMCIA

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

It's not "sequel," it's "squirrel."