this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2024
99 points (93.0% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35703 readers
3746 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm sure there's a perfectly good reason why we haven't done this yet. Too expensive? Would launching it into the sun cause the smoke (if there is even smoke in space) to find its way back to Earth, therefore polluting the air?

This is an incredibly stupid question.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mipadaitu@lemmy.world 86 points 1 week ago (5 children)

First - The major problem with trash isn't the getting rid of it part, it's the gathering it up part. If we could do that, it wouldn't be a problem.

Second - Launching things on a rocket is kinda dangerous still, there's a risk the rocket will blow up on launch, scattering the material across a large area. This is a big reason why things like nuclear waste is a problem to transport in general, much less flying it somewhere.

Third - Launching something into the SUN is really hard, it would be easier to send something out of the solar system than back into the sun.
https://van.physics.illinois.edu/ask/listing/43694

Fourth - Someday we'll figure out a use for everything, wall-e style. If we dump everything into a centralized landfill, we'll eventually be able to collect/sort/recycle it into something useful. Throwing it into the sun (or off-planet) would make that stuff unavailable forever.

Finally - Throwing stuff into the sun would actually get rid of it forever, yes. It would be completely decomposed into the atoms it was made from. If we threw ENOUGH heavy metals into the sun, we could actually poison the sun making it not able to fuse hydrogen anymore, but even if we threw the entire earth into the sun, it wouldn't be enough.

[–] andrewta@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago

Another problem is that each item we throw into the Sun is comprised of atoms. We would literally be taking the atoms that makes up earth and throwing them away to a place where the atoms would no longer be part of earth. While a McDonalds cup isn’t going to catastrophically change earth, do it enough times and we could see a problem.

[–] Doombot1@lemmy.one 21 points 1 week ago

What you also forgot to mention is just how much trash we generate… that would be a massive limiting factor as well. It’s hard enough to get a few tons of stuff on a rocket going to space. I couldn’t get an exact figure on a quick google search but humanity generates somewhere on the order of tens of thousands of metric tons of trash per day

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

First - The major problem with trash isn't the getting rid of it part, it's the gathering it up part. If we could do that, it wouldn't be a problem.

The frustrating part is that this could be the easiest to solve. Require boats to weigh in and out, and account for everything on board. Minus fuel, plus fish, but those old, broken nets and plastic waste need to return to port to be properly disposed of. Throwing even a soda can overboard should result in significant fines.

[–] xigoi@lemmy.sdf.org 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

How do you weigh a boat precisely enough to detect a soda can missing?

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Fair question. You're not going to catch a soda can, but a boat should be a closed system. The thresholds should be as low as is practically enforceable.

[–] LostXOR@fedia.io 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What about fishing boats? They're coming back with a ton of extra weight in fish.

[–] Ledivin@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Containers of fish are extremely easy to weigh.

[–] bestboyfriendintheworld@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

A lot of ocean trash comes by river from poor countries.

[–] yesman@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Ocean trash comes from plastic manufacturers. Responsible wealthy countries ship their dutiful recyclables to garbage pits in poor countries.

Most poor people don't even have the education or resources to polymerize crude into poly-vinyl, it's harder than you'd think.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

A lot of ocean trash comes by river from poor countries.

Also by river from wealthy countries, and has done so for centuries.

The scope of the task of removing it is far bigger than OP can imagine.

[–] bestboyfriendintheworld@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

https://ourworldindata.org/ocean-plastics

Most of the plastic in our oceans comes from land-based sources: by weight, 70% to 80% is plastic that is transported from land to the sea via rivers or coastlines

Most of the world’s largest emitting rivers are in Asia, with some also in East Africa and the Caribbean

Seven of the top ten rivers are in the Philippines. Two are in India, and one in Malaysia. The Pasig River in the Philippines alone accounts for 6.4% of global river plastics

Rich countries tend to have better functioning waste collection and disposal services.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Rich countries tend to have better functioning waste collection and disposal services.

These days it is a lot better, but it wasn't always that way.

It has been that way for many decades.

[–] MTK@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Also, sending things to space is way, way, way worse for our planet per kg of stuff, because of the fuel and parts that it takes

[–] Vilian@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Finally - Throwing stuff into the sun would actually get rid of it forever, yes. It would be completely decomposed into the atoms it was made from. If we threw ENOUGH heavy metals into the sun, we could actually poison the sun making it not able to fuse hydrogen anymore, but even if we threw the entire earth into the sun, it wouldn't be enough.

How can earth have enough heavy metals for that?

:edit english is hard

[–] mipadaitu@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You misread, I specifically said that Earth doesn't have enough mass for that.

[–] Vilian@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago