politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
Was it because of the kid-fucking, Matt? I bet it was about the kid-fucking.
Or perhaps the sex trafficking? You know to fly that child to the Bahamas so he could rape them?
He's my congressman, and I'll be the very last to defend him, but a 17-yo is hardly a "kid". So stop the bullshit. There's plenty to nail him to the wall without lying.
Well ackshually 🤓
It would appear that you’re the first to defend him.
Ah but hopefully he IS the last, at least on this thread, so he's actually right!
You know, I wanted to jump in here and jokingly defend Gaetz to take away the title from shalafi, but I couldn't even do that. Fuck Matt "kid fucker" Gaetz.
Schrodinger's Gaetz Defender
We found the republican pedo.
You seem to know a lot about him to forget it wasn't just about having sex with a minor, he was being investigated for sex trafficking a minor across state lines - https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/justice-department/matt-gaetz-s-ex-girlfriend-testifies-grand-jury-sex-trafficking-n1287352
Didn’t his buddy get arrested for creating fake IDs for underage girls also? Or some shit like that. Lol
It's in the article, it was his friend Joel Greenberg who was charged with a number of crimes, including trafficking the girl tied to Gaetz.
DeSantis though, had pictures taken of him while drinking with high school girls he was teaching at the time (only added this cause I confused this one with Gaetz). I love snopes mentions the girls were probably 18 because it was right before graduation, as if no one was born in the summer / non seniors wouldn't ever be at a graduation party.
https://www.snopes.com/news/2023/02/08/desantis-photo-grooming-girls-alcohol/
You claimed that you would be the last to defend him, then defended him? Like what?
Being in your thirties and having sex with someone nearly half your age is wildly inappropriate. There's so little that you would have in common as far as life experiences go. The years from 18-25 are some of the most influential in life and leaves people vulnerable to grooming. Experts claim that the brain hasn't even fully developed in most adults until 25 years old. Finding people in that age attractive as a 35 year old is fine. Watch porn to your hearts content, but pursuing a relationship or sexual encounter with someone in early adulthood is just weird. It doesn't need to be illegal to be fucking weird or predatory. In Gaetz's case it just so happens to be all three.
4D chess move, now no one else can defend him because he already called 'last'.
That looks to me like defending a kid-fucker.
Look, if you didn't lose your virginity until your 30s, maybe a 17-yo is a child to you. By the time I was 18, my gf (17) and I had fucked every way we could figure out. She was no child.
He was 40 when she was 17, trafficked across state lines for sex and money.
Not the same thing as a Romeo and Juliet relationship. This was child prostitution.
1 year difference is a bit different to half a lifetime difference and one is a kid. He likely groomed her
Furthermore, he's meant to be creating the laws. It's even worse to be fucking kids when you're in a position of power, and infinitely worse as AG
Was Gaetz 18? Also no one cares what you did, if you fucked a child it wouldn't make it right. What a weird argument
That's nice. Gaetz is still a kid-fucker.
If you're from Florida as you say you would know what he did was absolutely illegal, and what you did was legal. Florida always has had age gap laws defined around consent so long as the guardian doesn't disagree with their relationship. (Called the Romeo and Juliet laws).
They specified a 16 or 17 year old could sleep with up to a 23 year old if all parties are agreed (guardian permission would usually be needed). 24 Rape.
Everyone I knew in school knew that, because if a 17 year old sneaks in to party with a fake ID people at 18 were already worried., and 21 were extremely cautious)
That's really going out of a limb for the worst reason. I can't believe I have to say that if someone in their late thirties has sex with a 17 year old, that's gross on multiple levels and summing it up as fucking a kid is highly appropriate