this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2024
37 points (95.1% liked)

Canada

7203 readers
271 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 19 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

I'm gonna take a guess without watching and say:

Because freight company CP owns the lines people use riding Via.

And the various governments for decades have done nothing about anything to make rail better.

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 1 points 59 minutes ago

The way to get the highest score in railroad tycoon (classic game) is to prioritize the mail and passenger trains. Government could pay CN to let VIA prioritize traffic.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 hours ago

VIA operates on CN tracks in the west, but that doesn't negate the overall correctness of your statement.

They're always late because they don't own the infrastructure and have to take a back seat to their "landlord's " schedule.

[–] pedz@lemmy.ca 17 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Actually, Canada is a leader in high speed rail studies.

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago

I may be wrong but I recall learning somewhere that the recent rail project used the UK and Australia as a study for it. Neither of these countries are known for amazing high speed rail. Why didn't we look at Japan, France, Spain, or other countries that have world renowned high speed rail, high ridership rates, and good frequency?

The the time to build this rail was decades ago, lets use some of the most successful examples to study so we can catch up and build a modern system instead of building something that is already outdated.

[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 12 points 10 hours ago (1 children)
[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 10 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

You should see our UBI studies! We've got studies coming out our fucking ears.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Cracks_InTheWalls@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

I mean we have at least two study trials, Mincome in Manitoba in the 70s and the Ontario Basic Income Pilot Project in 2017 (though that one was cancelled after a few months due to a change in government).

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

So that's "no, not really." At least, that's my understanding, also.

Could definitely use more sustained for a reasonable amount of time, that much I'm sure of.