People Twitter

5239 readers

1939 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

Mark NSFW content.
No doxxing people.
Must be a tweet or similar
No bullying or international politcs
Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

SendMeYourTaTas@sh.itjust.works

pelespirit@sh.itjust.works

905

Why is no one talking about how unproductive it is to have verify every "hallucination" ChatGPT gives you? (lemmy.world)

submitted 23 hours ago by phoneymouse@lemmy.world to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works

102 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] archomrade@midwest.social 1 points 6 hours ago

Why do we expect a higher degree of trustworthiness from a novel LLM than we de from any given source or forum comment on the internet?

At what point do we stop hand-wringing over llms failing to meet some perceived level of accuracy and hold the people using it responsible for verifying the response themselves?

Theres a giant disclaimer on every one of these models that responses may contain errors or hallucinations, at this point I think it's fair to blame the user for ignoring those warnings and not the models for not meeting some arbitrary standard.