this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2024
173 points (96.8% liked)

Linux

5502 readers
224 users here now

A community for everything relating to the linux operating system

Also check out !linux_memes@programming.dev

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] anonymous111@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

[Serious question] Did Microsoft need to fundamentally change something, and that is why they back tracked on their Win10 evergreen promise? Or is this just a cash grab?

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I'm sure that it's just the marketing dept changing hands over time. Marketing teams are like a Scott's Tots situation: they are just trying to say whatever makes the product numbers look good in the near term. Fulfilling on any promises is a future marketing team's job.

"Of all the empty promises I have made, this one is by far the most generous"

- Michael Scott/Microsoft's marketing team

[–] bhamlin@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Microsoft has done this with every windows they've made. After the support period is over, you can pay for additional for a few years to help you transition. This one is so loud because windows 11 was such a privacy bait and switch.

Windows 11 is basically Windows 10, internally it hasn't changed names. They have to have an external trade name for it or people won't realize they're "behind."

[–] myrrh@ttrpg.network 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

...can i reposition my taskbar?..no?..then it's not the f*cking same...

[–] bhamlin@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

I wish that the only problem I had with windows 11 was that I couldn't reposition the taskbar.

[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

They started requiring the use of motherboards with a TPM. Which is compete and utter bullshit because you need to disable the chip to dual-boot, yet Windows 11 will run for several months at a time with the chip disabled before it complains and forces you to temporarily turn it back on again. So requiring it for "security" is just an excuse to force you to buy new hardware.