this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2025
391 points (98.5% liked)

politics

30994 readers
1672 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Rep. Warren Davidson (R-Ohio) threatened to withhold federal disaster relief from California during ongoing Los Angeles wildfires that have killed at least 16 people and destroyed over 12,000 structures.

Davidson criticized California’s forest management policies, echoing misleading right-wing claims that poor management, not climate change, is to blame.

California Gov. Gavin Newsom refuted these claims, noting that the state’s forest management budget has increased tenfold since 2019.

Davidson’s comments follow a pattern of GOP blaming state policies for disasters, similar to rhetoric from Trump.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Nougat@fedia.io 15 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I thought it was well established that decades of forest management that included extinguishing every single fire is what has produced an excess of fuel for today's fires.

Edit: In case I am misunderstood, I'm pretty sure that kind of forest management was changed a long time ago, but the consequences are still evident. I am not saying that denying funding is in any way correct or justified. There is nothing about California's forest management that would demand that.

[–] JohnnyCanuck@lemmy.ca 31 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yes, so what's "misleading" is that they're using these talking points to blame current forest management policies on the problem. Also they're doing this so they can ignore/deny that the climate is changing and making the area more susceptible to fires, no matter what your fire management policies are.

[–] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 30 points 2 years ago (2 children)

There's also the "California bad" rhetoric because nobody wants to live in shitass Ohio.

LMAO get bent Ohio GOP: https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Ohio

[–] Pips@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Never mind that California probably has more conservatives than most conservative states...

[–] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Yeah, it's a big place. Lots of farms vs the very high density cities.

[–] Zink@programming.dev 1 points 2 years ago

California has more 2024 Trump votes than the smallest 30 states have citizens of every age.

It’s very close to matching the Trump votes of Texas and Florida, but they were a bit ahead.

I’m on the other side of the continent, but California is a big place!

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

A Rizzler's last thoughts should be of Ohio.

[–] SupraMario@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

They stopped doing controlled burns. Climate change is just more fuel on the fire so to speak. Fire is natural, not allowing shit to burn away ungrowth has %100 not helped, but this is just repubs denying climate change like the fucking dipshits...as usual.

[–] gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

They stopped doing controlled burns

For a while, yes. They've been doing them again for a while now, though, so we're not even as bad at it as we were

[–] SupraMario@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

That's scary to think this could be worse.