this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2023
489 points (91.9% liked)

Fuck Cars

9624 readers
610 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] leekleak@lemmy.world 58 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Is walking better than biking? As I understand biking's more efficient.

[–] Atemu@lemmy.ml 31 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It depends. Expended energy/m is higher but space usage is much lower. For walking you arguably don't even need a paved path while (non-sport) cycling needs a somewhat even surface and places to store and lock the bike. It's not nearly as bad as with cars but even with cycling, space usage can become an issue in very densely populated areas; the Dutch don't build massive bike garages because it's cool (okay, maybe also a little of that) but because it's a necessity.

If it's near enough to walk, it's usually better to just walk.

[–] ntzm@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 year ago

More people are happy to walk than bike, and getting hit by a bike is worse than getting walked into by another person

[–] Zeth0s@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I guess it is because of the tires

[–] fiah@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I feel like the amount of wear I put on my shoes by walking a certain distance is higher than the wear on my tires when I bike that same distance

[–] FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Is it though? Time for science, it's the only way to tell for sure!

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I put about 2000 miles on my boots before they need replacing. They cost around 200usd.

[–] fiah@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I'm pretty sure my tires last twice as long at least

[–] Th3D3k0y@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Time to walk using tires instead of shoes.

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Well, you can buy sandals made from repurposed, used tires.

[–] woobie@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Save mother Gaia, go barefoot as goddess intended.