this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2025
274 points (98.2% liked)

politics

20464 readers
3082 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world -2 points 2 days ago (4 children)

The local police who are deferential to the judicial. That's how and why they can arrest people. The executive does not decide this.

Am I living in a universe where people just aren't tought these things in school?

[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 25 points 2 days ago

Welcome to the constitutional sherrifs movement where they are the law. The only law. Where they chose what is legal and right. They are above any federal law, system, etc.

Also, see: JD Vance saying trump can ignore the courts. And the numerous 'signs your gov is authoritarian/fascist' lists which include stacking/ignoring courts because, who is going to arrest the president? Especially when the supremacists/nationalists have been infiltrating police forces for well over a decade.

The way things ought are no longer applicable.

[–] Don_alForno@feddit.org 10 points 2 days ago (2 children)

"In a room sit three great men, a king, a priest, and a rich man with his gold. Between them stands a sellsword, a little man of common birth and no great mind. Each of the great ones bids him slay the other two. 'Do it,' says the king, 'for I am your lawful ruler.' 'Do it,' says the priest, 'for I command you in the names of the gods.' 'Do it,' says the rich man, 'and all this gold shall be yours.' So tell me—who lives and who dies?"

It sadly all comes down to who the police (and somewhere down the line the military) believe is right.

[–] Snowclone@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

So the money in almost every case then.

[–] underwire212@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What’s the answer to your riddle? I’m curious

[–] Don_alForno@feddit.org 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It's not mine, it's a quote from the book "A Clash of Kings" and subsequently the Game of Thrones TV show.

Anyway the answer is just what I wrote. Power resides where men believe it resides. In the riddle, it's entirely up to the sellsword which kind of power they value most.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I don't know what universe you're living in, but it isn't the normal one because you're wrong.

The local police are part of the executive branch of the local government. Not judicial.

That fundamental lack of understanding goes a long way to explain why you keep delusionally insisting that judges can enforce the law.

The executive does not decide this

They do.

Federal Court actions are enforced by the United States Marshals Service, which is part of the executive branch, which is under the President's Authority.

That's why we got the famous quote from President Andrew Jackson: "John Marshall has made his decision, now let him enforce it".