News
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
view the rest of the comments
On the one hand, I strongly agree with you. But when I think about it, she was teaching high school kids who would 100% get access to her videos. That just doesn't seem like a healthy situation for anyone involved. She sounds in the article like she accepts that she needs to do one or the other.
$42,000/year for a full time teacher is the real story here. That's outrageous.
Eh, deal with it. I'd rather have a moonlighting teacher than an unqualified one. At least this teacher was smart enough to not settle for $42k/year.
Who gives a shit if kids find out? If anything, it is a good lesson that teachers are human beings.
If you can't take someone seriously because you know they fuck? That is a you problem.
Lol as a teenager who had an attractive teacher for a class, I don't know if you understand what they're saying.
Teenagers are kids. Kids are, by their very nature, stupid. If they know said teacher is actively publishing content to an OF, they are absolutely going to find said content. It's just a whole mess for all parties involved.
Adults should absolutely be able to live their lives, but accept that kids are kids and kids do stupid shit.
Again, so what?
In High School, Ms Sell the british lit teacher was the "hot teacher". She talked about being a cheerleader in college and you can bet there were some of us who rubbed more than a few out imagining her in a cheerleader costume. And there was the really creepy and pathetic kid who cut up his yearbook and taped her face to a printout of a porn star he found online and pretended it was real... which was actually a good "holy shit some people are creepy fucks" realization in high school. It is a REAL learning moment to realize that, as awkward and pathetic as you are for jacking it with hand lotion in the bathroom while imagining your english teacher, you could be a LOT creepier.
So what? End of the day, she was the english teacher and (unlike one of the social studies teachers...) was not going to fuck students. End of story. Horny kids gonna be horny. But learning to interact with people is part of growing up.
Also, if the kid who taped her face to a printout was creepy, imagine the horror that is the deepfake present.
As for getting access to the content: If she were doing live chaturbate shows I would have more concerns. But this was a private OF account and it sounds like people never realized she was doing it until she did a collab with someone with a wider audience. And checking a few of the porn sites: The only uploads are specifically under her legal name with none under her OF name alone and are likely a result of this scandal. I would still have worn a mask if I were her and her husband but... whatever.
Also, getting back to Ms Sell: She had a kid junior year. I will always remember Ting frantically running up to a few of us at lunch and saying "Ms Sell is pregnant! That means she had sex!!!" and, before we could say "no shit?", Phil said "Why?" and we still mock him for that when we get together over a decade later.
So... are teachers also required to not get pregnant for fear of overstimulating the children?
What a small world. My social studies teacher was also banging a student. Did yours also end up in jail?
Not as far as I know. Woman banging boys so "cool" rather than "what the fucking shit? Call Chris Hansen!"
On the surface I agree but these are teenagers. What do you think the chances are of one of them subbing to her account and requesting her to make custom videos for them 😂 I would say pretty damn high. Hell it's still probably going to happen but at least the kids won't be sitting in class while watching videos of their teacher getting fucked.
Considering they would be using their parents' credit cards for this: Pretty low actually.
Lots of high schoolers have jobs and bank accounts with debit cards starting at 16.
From googling:
Interesting. It's been quite a while since I was that age, so I don't really remember needing a parental co-signer. One more thing, supposedly prepaid visa cards work so there's always that.
Have you ever been around highschool kids?... They're definitely going to make it a problem if they find out.
Why the hell would they get access to her videos?
They're horny teens with a hot teacher. 100000% a teen dream for most that age who are into ladies.
They can be horny all they want, it wont conjure a link to a specific person you dont even know has done any porn.
No, but you can bet their asses they're looking for the link to their old teacher's OF now.
There are sites that scrape and republish OF and the like. Less likely if they aren't doing public streams, but if someone puts up a bounty, it will likely show up.
But mostly this is just the ongoing "porn is the greatest threat to society" bullshit that tate-esque incels love spewing these days.
I agree. She can't continue teaching high school or probably even middle school boys once this comes out. She'd probably be fine teaching elementary age kids. There'd be a lot more dads attending parent-teacher conferences so it might even be a positive thing.
Why not? We need to stop treating sex workers like they are subhuman. The fact that parents aren't monitoring their childrens internet behavior isn't a reason to limit another person's career prospects if they chose to monetize their bodies past or present.
As long as the teacher in question isn't advertising her pornographic career or material to her students then why can't she continue to teach and earn money on the side as long as she's not bringing it into the classroom?