this post was submitted on 31 May 2025
330 points (98.5% liked)

196

3317 readers
2234 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SARGE@startrek.website 80 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I honestly wonder when, if ever, we will get to the point that ICE is met with solid resistance that keeps pouring in and refuses to let them leave without shots being fired.

I wonder if we will get to the point where ICE gets met with armed resistance.

I wonder if we will get to the point where regular citizens see an ICE raid, call up their local militia, and take up arms to protect our fellow citizens from kidnapping, torture, and death.

I wonder how long, if ever, before Canada opens itself to refugees fleeing persecution in the US, and a new underground railroad is established to get POC and LGBTQ+ to the saner land up north..

This is where we are headed. Anyone who thinks otherwise needs to go back and relearn their ww2 history.

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 48 points 2 days ago (2 children)

protect our fellow ~~citizens~~ humans from kidnapping, torture, and death.

Forgive the pedantic nitpicking, but we are so much more than our relationship to a state

Otherwise, excellent comment

Also an important distinction since the rhetoric from conservative talking heads recently has been that only citizens deserve habeas corpus, so the extrajudicial deportations are okay.

[–] via_solaris@piefed.social 3 points 2 days ago

That would be our relationship with each other if we were self-governing

[–] Truscape@lemm.ee 22 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Unfortunately, I fear that that the first 3 options would lead to something similar to a Waco-ATF incident. Civilians simply cannot surmount a force that has permission to use modern military equipment against the populace. It would be far more likely that the city would be burned to the ground, and each "law enforcer" would be acquitted in a federal court.

I do believe there is a possibility that a hostile public would make things difficult for ICE, but realistically protected emigration would be the most successful solution. Even though I dont want to leave California, I may have to emigrate with the others to stay alive.

[–] Graymouzer@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's not like they would have to win pitched battles with the military. If one ICE agent was shot every few days somewhere, it might become hard to recruit.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 16 points 2 days ago

I bet that ICE are inherently cowards. Racists can't take the heat, because their whole ideology is rooted in fear of the minority doing...something, anything, really.

[–] nik9000@programming.dev 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I heard someone reply to that argument once with, "ask The Taliban". I'm not sure I agree. But it did make me think.

[–] Truscape@lemm.ee 6 points 1 day ago

I don't think they are active equivalents. Unlike that situation, this is home field for both sides - with key infrastructure and intelligence data held extensively by the aggressor. The populace is not motivated or unified in ways that a populace defending against a foreign invader would.

While the technological gap may be somewhat different, the ability to conceal equipment is very limited by the defenders. It is unlikely that the aggressors would "withdraw" from the area as well, since their command would not tolerate losing a key economic and strategic location for the US (California has numerous military installations and production facilities). It is far more likely that ICE/Federal forces would double down.

Granted, this is from my perspective as an engineer who is trained in analyzing problems through a systems and logistics mindset. I don't know how passion or the human psyche would play into this.

I still believe these are not apt comparisons though.

[–] KingPorkChop@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 day ago

I honestly don't think Americans have it in them to do any sort of serious resistance.