this post was submitted on 08 Jun 2025
648 points (99.4% liked)

196

3484 readers
2398 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
 

A tweet states that National Guard or Active Duty military ordered to violate constitutional rights can call the GI Rights Hotline for support, with the number 1-877-447-4487 provided.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Wilco@lemm.ee 3 points 9 hours ago (4 children)

No. They should not shoot the officer that gives the order, that is a prison sentence no matter what.

The whole "disobey unethical orders" thing is for officers on the field receiving orders from command that they perceive as a warcrime (or against the constitution). They simply say "no, we aren't doing that".

[–] arrow74@lemm.ee 19 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (2 children)

If someone shoots an officer ordering war crimes that is justice, and probably why they don't allow military members to be tired by public courts. They would almost certainly be acquitted.

Honestly I like how the constitution says everyone without exception is allowed a jury trial, but we just pretend that it's okay for the military to not follow that. Like sure now they are volunteers, but conscription has a long history. It's kinda fucked up when you think about it, and definently unconstitutional

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

The military is told when they enlist that they are signing away their rights as a citizen until the term of enlistment, or their commission, is fulfilled. Personally I appreciated being bound by a much smaller, but somewhat more restrictive, set of rules that they gave each of us a copy of to read and learn. Turns out it's much easier to just do what you want to do, if you know how to do it within the rules.

[–] arrow74@lemm.ee 11 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I understand that's what we say, but it's not in the constitution and courts have ruled that you cannot sign away your rights as they are inalienable. Yet, it's allowed for the military to do so

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

Military kinda has to operate under its own jurisdiction. They have to be able to tell the president, "no." The founders didn't think we would have a standing military, so they didn't put provisions in the Constitution itself, but once it became clear that we were going to have to have a standing army and navy at all times, we changed the laws.

Also it can be argued that a court martial is better than a jury trial. Because the jury is made of JAG, so they actually know what the UCMJ says, and what precedents apply.

[–] arrow74@lemm.ee 4 points 2 hours ago

I get what you're saying, but historically the military does not tell the president "no" (at least to our knowledge) and has constantly committed war crimes with little to no repercussions

[–] Wilco@lemm.ee 0 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

No. You are 100% WRONG. Shooting an officer ordering a war crime is not justice ... it is actually criminal behavior. It is not how it is done.

Source: The UCMJ (Uniform Code of Military Justice)

[–] arrow74@lemm.ee 8 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Because the UCMJ has done such a great job of preventing war crimes and punishing war criminals....

Just because something is illegal doesn't make it unjust and vice versa.

After all according to the German military the holocaust was legal. If soldiers then murdered their officers they would have been seen by the world as heros.

Legality should not be the basis of your morality

[–] khaleer@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 hour ago

Legality is a copium for libs

[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

but that's illegal!

If this pops off, there are no laws. It's just men with guns. Your lib shit is going to get people killed. Lots of people. Your lib shit is how you start a civil war. Stop. Delete this comment. Im trying to reduce harm here, you're clearly into accellerationism.

the officers should

Yeah. Yeah they should. And if they don't, their soldiers should protest, by issuing a report in .768.

Political power, when there is no mutual respect or goal, comes out the barrel of a gun.

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today -2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Calm your fucking tities! If you just refuse illegal orders, they won't usually do shit against you, just court martial you. Or attempt to. They can't execute everyone

[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

If the officers learn that issuing these orders is unwise, the entire artifics of power will balk, and they may stop trying to massacre civilians this way for a few years.

What if you refuse, but the guy next to you already shot a protester?

This administration does not give a shit what the courts or constitution have to say. Do you not remember what these people are protesting? Can you repeat for me, so i know you know?

Why do you think an institution that orders people to shoot unarmed civilians still deserves your faith and respect? That's a genuinely vile level of boot licking.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 12 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

Fragging shit officers is a time honored tradition of the enlisted. I say that as an officer. The legality of it really doesn't matter at the time.

[–] scathliath@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Careful, talking about Fragging during Vietnam was what started my booting off Reddit, lmao, I'm kidding at least about being careful.

[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world -3 points 5 hours ago

Can't these babykillers do warcrimes against brown people that don't inconvenience the US as usual?!?