this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2025
638 points (97.2% liked)

Fuck Cars

12133 readers
722 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Edit: of course this is satire. The power of the reading comprehension devil grows stronger every day 😢

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 56 points 2 days ago (3 children)

This has clearly got to be satire, but the issue with "walkable communities" is the zoning. You need commerce close to those houses - a coffee shop, a bakery, small supermarket, dry cleaner, small doctor's office, a couple of restaurants, etc.

Not a huge strip of stores, just a few every other block.

Ditch the school buses, and instead create actual bus routes that the kids, but also everyone else, can hop on and off to get around.

[–] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

100% satire or comedy. 3.7 miles is not "walkable". That's 7.4 miles round trip. 2-3 hours of walking.

[–] towerful@programming.dev 9 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I presume US schools have to buy/rent busses and pay bus drivers? Specifically to drive kids to/from school?
Instead of the council (or whatever) subsidising routes that connect new builds to schools, and giving under 16s free bus travel.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago

Very mixed. Just for my kids ….

  • walked to elementary school
  • car to middle school (because they classified it as walkable but it was very long plus had to cross two major streets)
  • car to high school - private school several towns away. School was Actually on the subway … the other direction
[–] Soggy@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago

It's complicated and different districts do different things. Plenty of kids did take the city bus to my high school (there was a vastly reduced fee for minors and plenty of subsidized programs for free or cheap monthly passes).

[–] mdd@lemm.ee 9 points 1 day ago

Yes, in the smaller cities and towns where things tend to be more spread out. The is not reliable public transportation.

Big cities like NYC and LA don't normally bus children to school. They are usually close to the school and can walk or take public transit.

[–] psud@aussie.zone 3 points 1 day ago

In my Australian town of half a million people (Canberra) our public transport is practically all buses, the same buses do the school services. We're pretty car based but still I have 3 commercial places within 20 minutes of walking, covering medical, groceries, two butchers, hairdressers, a few independent restaurants, a few chain takeaways. Our nearest pub closed years ago, taxes on alcohol got too high for people to meet a few times a week at a pub