this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2025
600 points (98.7% liked)

News

30350 readers
2989 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

During a Tuesday hearing at the 9th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, the DOJ urged a three-judge panel to issue an emergency stay of a lower court order and allow the Trump administration’s deployment of the California National Guard to continue in Los Angeles — going so far as to argue a president’s federalization of militia can’t be second-guessed by the courts, even if the chief executive mobilized forces from all 50 states and Washington, D.C., simultaneously.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 15 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

Yup. Until they take responsibility for the impact of their ego stroking and try to do anything at all to help, we're not going to let the people just shy of collaborators forget it.

[–] ronigami@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ironic since the Democratic party not supporting ranked choice voting is its own ego play. They just can’t stomach the idea of there being more than two parties. Same on the right. Unfortunately this centrism has resulted in the status quo.

[–] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ironic since the Democratic party not supporting ranked choice voting is its own ego play.

No. It's a control play to try to maintain power (including wealth inequality). Egotists are involved but they're different things.

[–] ronigami@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How is “I want to maintain power” not an ego play?

[–] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 1 day ago

It's something that egotistical people might do but, they might also lie about the importance of their job or pay people to follow them around in an entourage. Not all egotists are as power hungry as politicians frequently are some want to be loved and adored.

The motivation matters and, while those that lust for power generally are egotistical, egotism itself isn't usual the reason.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Especially when so many continue to double and triple down rather than just accept that they fucked up.

At least the "Arabs for Trump" folks did a pretty much immediate about face. Still awful that they existed in the first place, but at least they had the wherewithal to walk it back when reality hit them.

So many people here just refuse to, and will call your progressive beliefs into question because you don't bury your head in the sand like them

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Yup. Every time I'm critical of the idiots who didn't vote or voted 3rd party, the downvotes let me know those idiots are still out there, not grasping that they're idiots. There's a lot of them on Lemmy.

They fucked up. On some level they know it, but they're not big enough to admit it.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

They were too small a group to appeal to, now they're solely to blame.

Which is it?

[–] Lightor@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

How do you read "take responsibility for their impact" and then jump to "solely to blame." I swear people just hear what they want so they have a reason to be angry.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Are they to blame, or are they small enough to ignore?

Which one? I get that you want both. But you only get one.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm curious as to why you think you have the kind of authority in anyone's life to tell them they have to decide between two dipshit choices you present them.

These dumbfucks made an incredibly stupid decision, whether they ended up being too small a group to make the difference or not. They're still dumbfucks that chose their own perceived moral superiority over the wellbeing of their country.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

I’m curious as to why you think you have the kind of authority in anyone’s life to tell them they have to decide between two dipshit choices you present them.

Choosing both is logically inconsistent. I get that you hate progress and anyone who opposes genocide and want to ignore them so you can move to the right and have your genocide. That's disgusting, but fine, if you want to choose that, it's all centrists do. But if you do it on the grounds that the people you hate for not being republican-adjacent enough for your liking aren't a big enough group to matter, you don't get to act like they matter after the fact just so you don't have to stop moving to the right.

[–] nomy@lemmy.zip -2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Found the 3rd party voter I guess.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

That's the assumption whenever someone contradicts centrist orthodoxy.

It's wrong, but centrists never let that stop them.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago

The democratic party is a corpse these days.

[–] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They were too small a group to appeal to

That was always a lie. But they are among the least reliable voters.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That was always a lie. But they are among the least reliable voters.

I mean, you can't ignore people or treat them with undisguised contempt if you want them to be reliable voters.

[–] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think that that is looking at the problem from the wrong angle (even if it is extremely common). We need to not give a fuck what they think of us as we subvert their party and force it into something that's actually at all Left of center. That's impossible with people sitting out elections (especially primaries) and offering zero meaningful resistance to or action against the fascist Right.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

That’s impossible with people sitting out elections (especially primaries)

democrats successfully argued in court that they don't need to run honest primaries. They didn't even have them last year.