this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2025
187 points (90.5% liked)

Selfhosted

50026 readers
555 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The future is community-hosted


Related Hacker News thread:

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 35 points 1 week ago (5 children)

The authors approach to not owning anything digital was to attempt self hosting. But the authors reaction to the amount of work was that he shouldn’t own the “self-hosting”? He does not even realize that he’s back to not owning anything

[–] elDalvini@discuss.tchncs.de 29 points 1 week ago (4 children)

He proposes the cloud be owned by communities, so in a way by everyone. That's not the same everything being owned by private companies.

[–] NotKyloRen@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

So is he insinuating that communities should have IT people who keep things running for everyone (like a digital librarian of sorts)?

Because that takes time, effort, and money. Like a lot more than one would spend or need for just themselves/family/maybe a couple of friends.

Also, community-run self-hosting just seems like a bad idea from a privacy and legality standpoint. One pirate getting caught isn't usually so bad (usually a warning or small fine). But once you start distributing, then you're going from a kiddie pool of consequences into an ocean of consequences. We're talking massive fines and/or jail time.

Edit: I should clarify that I'm not talking about services here, but content itself.

[–] maxwellfire@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

There's so much to host that isn't related to pirated media sharing though. I host like 5 services and only one could be related to that. I know you clarified that you're talking about content, but there's also so much content that isn't related to pirating either. Like most of the fediverse for example

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)