this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)
NBA - Main
15 readers
1 users here now
Game analysis, highlights and everything else that is happening in the NBA.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The warriors won't be in too bad of shape they'll just need to start over. Curry was picked at 7, Thompson 11 and Draymond in the 2nd round. They're a perfect example of why taking isn't necessary. You don't need the #1 pick to get talent.
You could pick the best player in 95% of draft classes and still not end up with a player as good as Curry.
Agreed, my point is you're not that much more likely to find a Steph Curry at #1 or #2 than you are at #8 or #9. Look at where Giannis and Jokic were drafted, for example.
If you draft well, develop players you draft and get lucky with injuries (Curry getting signed for cheap at the end of his rookie deal, for example) then things can go really well even if the picks aren't in the top 3.
It's pretty notable that the Warriors haven't repeated this feat in over 10 years. Since the Draymond draft, they've been moderately successful with Loon, hopeful about Kuminga, and I'll leave Poole for others to judge, but certainly no all-stars so far.
Granted it's early, and I wouldn't yet write off Wiseman or some others, but let's not pretend that starting over is easy because the Dubs have the draft game figured out.
Looney was the 30th pick. He’s had a highly successful career relative to that
Oh yeah I don't mean it's easy but they'll be in the same boat as every other team. The idea that they'll be in a historically bad place isn't really right. I'm not a GSW fan but their success shows the possibilities for other franchises especially as an alternative to bottoming out and tanking.