this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2023
2028 points (99.3% liked)

Privacy

31833 readers
131 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

And since you won't be able to modify web pages, it will also mean the end of customization, either for looks (ie. DarkReader, Stylus), conveniance (ie. Tampermonkey) or accessibility.

The community feedback is... interesting to say the least.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 154 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Inb4 you can only browse the internet with Chromium.

[–] BlackEco@lemmy.blackeco.com 131 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

Well, the engineers say it themselves: nothing would prevent websites developers to prevent access from browsers that do not support this "Web DRM".

My biggest fear though is that it becomes a standard which all browsers will have to support to stay relevant. And with Google building the engine used by the vast majority of browsers, they can force this upon other browser engines (ie. Safari and Firefox).

[–] sab@kbin.social 159 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's such a potent example why everyone who cares need to stop using Chromium based browsers before it's too late. Stunts like this would be much harder to pull if there wasn't a de facto browser monopoly.

[–] Zink@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

For what it’s worth, this comment just inspired me to switch my work PC from edge to Firefox. Was already using it in Linux, and will switch my home PC tonight.

[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

All they need is a few major sites and tools requiring it to domino everything on the internet. Suddenly it's standard.

Most businesses all use either chrome or Microsoft. And they're both Chromium.

[–] Cube6392@beehaw.org 38 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Literally just applying it to YouTube would send tremors throughout the internet. If YouTube stopped working in Safari or Firefox, anyone using those browsers who don't really care and just liked those browsers for other reasons will give them up and go to a chromium based browser.

Google is fighting an apathy battle. One they know they can probably win because they own the Internet's favorite content hub

[–] BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago

It makes sense that they have YouTube in their sights for DRM lockdown.

[–] nivenkos@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Reminds me of Microsoft with the ActivePlatform / Blackbird stuff in the 90s.

Awful to see Google turn into that.

[–] brombek@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Google will just say that pages with DRM will rank higher in their search and it's all done.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago

It's time to fork the community internet off the corporate one. Set up our own DRM-free sites and our own search engines, run by open source software. With blackjack and hookers.

[–] Spedwell@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sites that rely on ad revenue would have every business reason to switch to WebDRM-only.

[–] dust_accelerator@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Everyone talks about this like it wouldn't open a massive attack surface for the mother of DDOS.

Make the attestor slow or take it out, you take down large parts of their business. I don't know, i wouldn't put too much stake in a platform/website that could be taken out so completely.

[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Doesn't Firefox support DRM? I know on netacad.com it prompts me to enable it, or rather on a CCNA course. Or is it something else?

[–] BlackEco@lemmy.blackeco.com 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What you are mentioning is media DRM (think Netflix, Spotify). This is something entirely different: a mechanism to ensure the entire content of a web page is not tempered with.

[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 year ago
[–] 001100010010@lemmy.dbzer0.com 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Please drink verification can

[–] Rolive@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 year ago

ERROR! Piracy detected!

[–] fistac0rpse@kbin.social 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I have exceeding low expectations, but I would hope that would be grounds for an antitrust lawsuit against Google as Chromium browsers account for roughly 70% of all users (based on numbers I pulled from Wikipedia)

[–] whatsarefoogee@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

Antitrust lawsuit? What's that?

When is the last time any of the big tech companies got hit with antitrust? Microsoft is brazenly doing shit on windows they wouldn't even dream of in early 2000s. Resetting user defaults to their products. Constantly advertising their products when user launches a competitors software.

They don't give a fuck and neither do the governments.

[–] TheOhNoNotAgain@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Sounds like EU will come for the rescue. In 2029...