this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2025
836 points (99.1% liked)

Not The Onion

18190 readers
1110 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This is a real thing Peter Thiel told a group of tech professionals recently.

In a four-part series of religious lectures in San Francisco, Peter Thiel — yes, that Peter Thiel — has argued that the End Times are nigh and that a biblical Antichrist — yes, that Antichrist — will come to Earth in the form of onerous government regulations placed on science, technology, and AI.

These are, incidentally, areas where the tech billionaire, venture capitalist, and cofounder of Palantir has a vested financial interest. [...]


Note: source uses a two-headline system; the submission uses the shorter of the two

Archived: https://web.archive.org/web/20250925211248/https://www.theverge.com/ai-artificial-intelligence/785407/peter-thiel-antichrist-tech-regulation

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NutWrench@lemmy.ml 28 points 1 day ago (2 children)

We elected someone for president who literally embodies ALL of the Seven Deadly Sins. I'd say the AntiChrist is already here.

[–] F_State@midwest.social 1 points 2 hours ago

Didn't Jesus walk the holy land convincing god's chosen people to break their covenant with god? Sounds like Jesus was the Anti-Christ

[–] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 16 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Its actually amazing how the complete opposite of Christian he is and yet Christians love him... even when he says he isn't Christian.

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Its actually amazing how the complete opposite of Christian he is

The thing that you're missing is that christianity is a pretty brutal, cold-hearted thing. It was never meant to be about compassion and love. That's just what they tell the children sothat they get onboard with it all.

It's like, when you're teaching maths to children and you present fractions using apples and pies, pretty harmless things. Years later, you can use more advanced maths (that are based on the basics of maths) to engineer weapons and heavy machinery, and it's all based on the same maths. It's not about being cute, it's about maths, it's more abstract than any of the applications.

[–] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Math and science are completely neutral things. You can use them for any numbernof purposes, good or bad. AI could be a tremendous force for good, even the 'art generation' stuff i am sure has SOME uses (my use for it is making furry porn and nothing more).

But as it stands... it is being directly applied to gathering every single thing about everyone, fooling them into thinking they are having private conversations when absolutely everything is being logged, and causing emotional dependencies on programs that aren't people, and even killing others with military AI.

I remember in 2014 when the Robocop remake came out the whole point of that movie is talking about how AI law enforcement is a bad idea specifically because AI has absolutely no feelings whatsoever... and that trope of AI monsters killing people due to programming glitches, programming intent, or just utilitarian approaches has been around since the 1960s and 70s with 2001a space Odyssey and West World.

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

utilitarian approaches has been around since the 1960s and 70s

utilitarian approaches have been around for much longer than that, at least since 1500 when machiavelli wrote the influential book "the prince" where he argued utilitarism.

[–] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 2 points 3 hours ago

Correct. But I am referring to unfeeling computers writing off people like they were just assets and tools, like an unneeded screwdriver or empty soda can.

[–] VinnyDaCat@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Not entirely surprising given how hypocritical Christians tend to be.

You put on one to two big performances a week, sometimes more depending on the time of year, and then the moment you walk out of the theater building all those supposed morals and values get forgotten.