politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
I always have to laugh when I'd see people online arguing for rural areas/rural states and getting chapped about states being called "flyover states". They'd start with that "but WE supply your food! The people in the cities would starve without us!"
WTAF. Get outta here with that shit. First of all, most of what I eat comes from Mexico and California. Secondly, it's not as if these people are supplying food out of a sense of altruism. They act like they are really doing something truly noble and everyone else should bow and scrape over their racist bullshit because of that?
These people are going to really not know what to say as automation really, really starts taking flight for these kinds of jobs (why we started applying AI to things like white collar jobs first I have no idea). I know for a fact that full, end-to-end automation is a goal of the coal industry and it sure as hell is one for farming, too, as I saw a presentation on it being made several years ago. In any case, it's going to be hard for these morons that happen to live near corporations extracting food from the land act like they should call the shots on how most Americans live their lives.
These assholes have been unable to deal with the reality that most Americans live in cities and have for quite some time....they just have not caught up. But these people think a minority are "real murica".
They are, though? And it has massively changed the dynamics in agriculture. They just don't make headlines because they're technical behind-the-scenes stuff
It's something that annoys me a bit when everyone started talking about AI, but only really a small part of it, and then thinking that's the be-all-end-all of the field. It never was, and still isn't. People just don't know about the rest, and don't read up on it either
Side note: farming is an area where the "Internet of Things" is used extensively as well, but when people think of IoT, they similarly only think about smart homes. Same problem as well
I watched a talk given about the mining industry (and this was pre-2023 by many years - that's the year a whole lot of Americans seemed to wake up to "AI" being a thing outside of sci-fi) seeking to automate things end-to-end. Especially as they want to extract things in places that are more and more remote, having human involvement is very expensive.
So that was the extractive industry, talking to itself in frank terms; meanwhile, you had Donvict in his first term doing lots of performative bullshit (remember all the assholes screaming at journalists to "learn to code" when they were being laid off? Pretty sure that originated in stupid talking points related to miners) about "the miners" - the very miners the extractive industry wants to entirely eliminate.
I have no doubts that the agriculture is seeking to do the same and there are probably places where similar talks have been/are being given. I know that things like having GPS guiding the machinery is already a given. I know there were already pilot programs for automation in things like, say, picking strawberries.
It's rather ironic given where things are likely going - it seems like neither Republicans nor Democrats have really copped to the stark near-term realities on such things...
California?
Now show me how much of that shit is (or, should I say, was, until the advent of orangeboi’s brilliant tariff policy) exported.
This is what the bailouts are for; the symptom being treated is a gunshot wound to the foot, caused by the patient aiming and discharging a firearm at said foot.
Honestly, my reaction at this point is to engineer around the middle of the fucking country. New England and the pacific states and Illinois should just build shitloads of vertical farms and roll with that. Fuck the flyovers. They’re by and large holding us back with their idiocy and regressive politics - or more pointedly, their gullible susceptibility to such an incredible variety of idiotic political scams.
I’m not convinced any significant part of my food is produced by flyover states. I eat local when I can, I know California is a huge food producer, but it seems like most food is from other countries.
Let those flyover states continue to milk that high fructose corn syrup I try to avoid and that ethanol I don’t use in my EV, right into an early grave
Checking the tofu (soy) in my fridge…… it doesn’t say where it is from but “distributed by” and import company certainly implies it’s sourced from other countries
Yup. Same. The food made in flyover states is mostly stuff fed to animals (which I don't eat) or is piped into a lot of processed foods, which I try to minimize my intake of, while I try to maximize my intake of things made in California (and Mexico), etc.
They specified food that is actually eaten. As opposed to turned into animal feed or even stupider like corn turned into gasoline.
Yes, California.
Useless map. The only potential human food on that map is wheat.
It's also almost 20 years old
Edit: I actually didn't see the fruits, nuts, etc but my point still stands IMO.
Huh? Humans eat corn, soybeans, fruit, nuts and vegetables, which are all on the map.
The corn and soybeans grown in the US is not for humans
Thanks. I wasn't aware. I'm doing some reading and it's surprising.
The fruit and nuts could also be human food. Other than California it's pretty much only in Florida.